Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: GRANULATION TECHNOLOGY INC.

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of GRANULATION TECHNOLOGY INC. in 12 INDUSTRIAL RD, FAIRFIELD, NJ 07004 (NAICS 325412). OSHA activity number 341472033.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Granulation Technology INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Granulation Technology INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
12 INDUSTRIAL RD
City
FAIRFIELD
State
NJ
ZIP
07004
Mailing
12 INDUSTRIAL RD, FAIRFIELD, NJ 07004
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325412
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

8 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a) Facility  The employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to, N95 filtering facepiece respirators during mixing and blending operations.  Violation occurred on or about 05/12/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a) Facility  The employer did not provide medical evaluations for employees required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to, N95 filtering facepiece respirators during mixing and blending operations.  Violation occurred on or about 05/12/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator, whenever a different respirator facepiece (size, style, model or make) is used, and at least annually thereafter:  a) Facility  The employer did not provide fit tests for employees required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to, N95 filtering facepiece respirators during mixing and blending.      Violation occurred on or about 05/12/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(1): The employer did not provide effective training to ensure that each employee could demonstrate knowledge of 1910.134(k)(1)(i) - (vii):  a) Facility  The employer did not provide effective training for employees required to wear respirators such as, but not limited to, N95 filtering facepiece respirators during mixing and blending.  Violation occurred on or about 05/12/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  a) Facility  A lockout/tagout program was not established where employees maintain and/or service machinery and equipment including, but not limited to, Kikusui Tablet press model L1BRA836KAWCZ (Machine # 42).  Violation occurred on or about 05/12/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a) Facility  The employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees who handle hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, methylcellulose, guaifenesin, fructose and lactose.  Violation occurred on or about 05/12/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1800
  • · Z (S) $2400

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Sep 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a) Facility  The employer did not provide effective information and training for employees who use hazardous materials such as, but not limited to, methylcellulose, guaifenesin, fructose and lactose.  Violation occurred on or about 05/12/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.178 L06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(6): The employer did not certify that each operator has been trained and evaluated as required by this paragraph (l):  a) Facility  The employer did not certify that each employee was trained and evaluated to operate pallet jacks.  Violation occurred on or about 05/26/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View Granulation Technology INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341472033.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.