WASHINGTON, PA —
OSHA Inspection: PITT CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of PITT CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC in 131 SOUTH COLLEGE STREET, WASHINGTON, PA 15301 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341473692.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PITT CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC
- Site address
- 131 SOUTH COLLEGE STREET
- City
- WASHINGTON
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15301
- Mailing
- 832 LOVINGTON DRIVE, PITTSBURGH, PA 15216
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 5
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- May 18, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,360 · Current $862 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: (a) Jobsite: On or about May 13, 2016, the ground man was not wearing a hard hat. Employees were doing roofing work above this ground man.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $862
- — Z (S) $1360
1926.501 B11
- Issued
- May 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 24, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(11): Each employee on a steep roof with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems with toeboards, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems: (a) Jobsite: On or about May 13, 2016, employees were working on a steep roof and they were either improperly tied off or they were not tied off at all. The fall hazard to the employees was about 25 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1680
- — Z (S) $2800
1926.501 B10
- Issued
- May 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 24, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-slope roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet or more above lower levels, was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line system and guardrail system, warning line system and safety net system, or warning line system and personal fall arrest system, or warning line system and safety monitoring system. Or, on roofs 50-feet (15.25 m) or less in width, each employee was not protected by use of a monitoring system: (a) Jobsite: On or about May 13, 2016, employees were walking on a low sloped roof and they were not protected from falling to the ground. The fall hazard to the employees was about 15 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 C
- Issued
- May 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 24, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c): When the employer has reason to believe that any affected employee who has already been trained does not have the understanding and skill required by paragraph (a) of this section, the employer is to retrain each such employee such as inadequacies in an affected employees knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding of skill: (a) Jobsite: On or about May 13, 2016, the employees needed to be retrained in how to properly use fall protection when working from a roof. When employees were tied off while on the steep roof they were improperly tied off. The employees were tying off to a carabiner that the employees had attached to the front of their safety harnesses at a point below their belt buckle. In addition, none of the employees were utilizing their leg straps to their safety harnesses when they were tied off.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B06
- Issued
- May 18, 2016
- Abate by
- May 24, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,020 · Current $658 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(6): Unsecured ladder(s) were used on surfaces that were not stable and level: (a) Jobsite: On or about May 13, 2016, employees were using a 32 foot aluminum extension ladder that was set up on the lower 3 in 12 pitched roof and the ladder was not secured. This ladder was on an angle to accommodate the sloped angel of the roof.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $658
- — Z (S) $1020
More inspections at Pitt Contracting Services LLC
View Pitt Contracting Services LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341473692.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.