NEW HAVEN, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: CLEVER CASALE
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CLEVER CASALE in 166 YORK STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341474443.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CLEVER CASALE
- Site address
- 166 YORK STREET
- City
- NEW HAVEN
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06511
- Mailing
- 292 ELM STREET !ST FLOOR, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
9 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 12, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 30, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 292 Elm Street 2nd floor, West Haven CT 06516 Certification and documentation of corrective action was not received within 10 calendar days: a. By August 11, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 001a, Citation 01, Item 002, Citation 01, Item 003a, Citation 01, Item 004, Citation 01, Item 005 and Citation 01, Item 006. b. By August 22, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 001b and Citation 01 Item 003b.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1926.451 F03
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity: Jobsite: The pump jack scaffold from that the employees were performing construction activities was not inspected daily for visible defects by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.454 A01
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area. Jobsite: The employees who were performing construction activities from the pump jack scaffold without fall protection were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the pump jack scaffold being used.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 F06
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6). Jobsite: The pump jack scaffold from that employees were performing construction activities was erected within 3 feet of the 120/240 volt electrical power line to the building.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.451 F07
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person. Jobsite: The pump jack scaffold from that the employees were performing construction activities was not erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.454 B
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question. Jobsite: The employee who was involved in erecting, maintaining and inspecting the pump jack scaffold from that employees were performing construction activities was not trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G01 VII
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section. Jobsite: The employees who were performing construction activities from the pump jack scaffold were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.452 J02
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary. Jobsite: The bottoms of the poles of the pump jack scaffold from that the employees were performing construction activities were not secured to the structure.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.452 J04
- Issued
- Jul 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(4): Work benches shall not be used as scaffold platforms. Jobsite: Employee were using the work bench as a scaffold work platform.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341474443.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.