Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: CLEVER CASALE

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CLEVER CASALE in 166 YORK STREET, NEW HAVEN, CT 06511 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341474443.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Clever Casale for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Clever Casale is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CLEVER CASALE
Site address
166 YORK STREET
City
NEW HAVEN
State
CT
ZIP
06511
Mailing
292 ELM STREET !ST FLOOR, WEST HAVEN, CT 06516
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
3
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 9 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Jan 12, 2017
Abate by
Jan 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 292 Elm Street 2nd floor,  West Haven CT  06516  Certification and documentation of corrective action was not received within 10 calendar days:   a.   By August 11, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 001a, Citation 01, Item 002, Citation 01, Item 003a, Citation 01, Item 004, Citation 01, Item 005 and Citation 01, Item 006.  b.   By August 22, 2016  for Citation 01, Item 001b and Citation 01 Item 003b.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $400

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  Jobsite: The pump jack scaffold from that the employees were performing construction activities was not inspected daily for visible defects by a competent person.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.454 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2016
Abate by
Aug 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1): The employer failed to have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained regarding the nature of any electrical hazards, fall hazards and falling object hazards in the work area.  Jobsite: The employees who were performing construction activities from the pump jack scaffold without fall protection were not trained to recognize the hazards associated with the pump jack scaffold being used.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F06

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).    Jobsite: The pump jack scaffold from that employees were performing construction activities was erected within 3 feet of the 120/240 volt electrical power line to the building.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.  Jobsite:  The pump jack scaffold from that the employees were performing construction activities was not erected under the supervision of a person competent in scaffold erection.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2016
Abate by
Aug 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.  Jobsite:  The employee who was involved in erecting, maintaining and inspecting the pump jack scaffold from that employees were performing construction activities was not trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01 VII

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(vii): Each employee on a scaffold, not otherwise specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (g)(1)(vi) of this section, more than 10 feet (3.1 m) above lower level was not protected from falls by the use of personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting the requirements of paragraph (g)(4) of this section.  Jobsite:  The employees who were performing construction activities from the pump jack scaffold were not protected from fall hazards by the use of guardrails or personal fall arrest systems.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.452 J02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing or equivalent at the bottom, top, and other points as necessary.  Jobsite:  The bottoms of the poles of the pump jack scaffold from that the employees were performing construction activities were not secured to the structure.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.452 J04

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 26, 2016
Abate by
Aug 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(4): Work benches shall not be used as scaffold platforms.  Jobsite: Employee were using the work bench as a scaffold work platform.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341474443.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.