Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SANCHEZ SIDING SERVICES

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SANCHEZ SIDING SERVICES in 2982 HIGHLAND WOODS BLVD., LOT #73, BLACKLICK, OH 43004 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 341484368.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sanchez Siding Services — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sanchez Siding Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2982 HIGHLAND WOODS BLVD., LOT #73
City
BLACKLICK
State
OH
ZIP
43004
Mailing
1545 BYRD DRIVE, LOT 26, COLUMBUS, OH 43219
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Sep 1, 2016
Abate by
Oct 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer must submit to the Agency, along with the information on abatement certification required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section, documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:   a. In regards to citation 1, item 1, issued on May 25, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, June 7, 2016.  The violation read as follows:       29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I):  Flexible cords and cables shall be protected from damage. Sharp corners and projections shall be avoided.  Flexible cords and cables may pass through doorways or other pinch points, if protection is provided to avoid damage:      a.  On or about May 18, 2016, at the residential construction site, the flexible extension cord that supplied power to the DeWalt circular saw used for cutting the siding was damaged in that bare wires were visible for the hot and neutral conductors, thereby exposing employees to electrical and fire hazards.     b. In regards to citation 1, item 2, issued on May 25, 2016, the employer has failed to submit abatement certification and documentation within ten days of the abatement date, June 7, 2016.  The violation read as follows:       29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  "Residential construction."  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities six feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure.  Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502.  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems.  Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems:     a.  On or about May 18, 2016, at the residential construction site, an employee working on the roof was not protected by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, thereby exposing an employee to a fall hazard of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.405 A02 II I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
29 CFR 1926.405(a)(2)(ii)(I):  Flexible cords and cables shall be protected from damage. Sharp corners and projections shall be avoided.  Flexible cords and cables may pass through doorways or other pinch points, if protection is provided to avoid damage:   a.  On or about May 18, 2016, at the residential construction site, the flexible extension cord that supplied power to the DeWalt circular saw used for cutting the siding was damaged in that bare wires were visible for the hot and neutral conductors, thereby exposing employees to electrical and fire hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 25, 2016
Abate by
Jun 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13):  "Residential construction."  Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels shall be protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system unless another provision in paragraph (b) of this section provides for an alternative fall protection measure.  Exception: When the employer can demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems, the employer shall develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of 1926.502:  Note: There is a presumption that it is feasible and will not create a greater hazard to implement at least one of the above-listed fall protection systems.  Accordingly, the employer has the burden of establishing that it is appropriate to implement a fall protection plan which complies with 1926.502(k) for a particular workplace situation, in lieu of implementing any of those systems:  a.  On or about May 18, 2016, at the residential construction site, an employee working on the roof was not protected by a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, thereby exposing an employee to a fall hazard of approximately 14 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2800

View Sanchez Siding Services's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341484368.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.