Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: ADAN RUIZ CASADERO

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ADAN RUIZ CASADERO in 113 CLOVER POINT CIR LOT 235, GUYTON, GA 31312 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341488542.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Adan Ruiz Casadero for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Adan Ruiz Casadero is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ADAN RUIZ CASADERO
Site address
113 CLOVER POINT CIR LOT 235
City
GUYTON
State
GA
ZIP
31312
Mailing
3370 LANSBURY VILLAGE DR. APT #2, ATLANTA, GA 30341
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:    a) At the jobsite, on or about May 19, 2016, employees performing wood framing work while exposed to being struck on the head by materials and tools were not wearing head protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.    a) At the jobsite, on or about May 19, 2016, employees were performing wood framing activities that included operating portable electric hand tools such as pneumatic nail guns, and circular saws without the use of eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,100 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):     a) At the jobsite, on or about May 19, 2016, employees working on a second working level while performing wood framing were exposed to open floor joists and exposed leading edges without fall protection provided, exposing employees to fall hazards of up to 19.5 feet onto the ground (outside the structure) or concrete floor (inside the structure).      b) At the jobsite, on or about May 19, 2016, employees were working near and/or getting materials through a window opening on the second floor without any fall protection system in place, thus exposing employees to a fall hazard of 11 feet onto the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2100
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 1, 2016
Abate by
Jun 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:     a) At the jobsite, on or about May 19, 2016, employees used an aluminum extension ladder that only extended about 2 feet above the upper landing surface of a second working level during wood framing activities of a new single family residential dwelling, resulting in fall hazards of up to 10.5 feet onto concrete.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341488542.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.