Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
2,004,209Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: THE AMES COMPANIES OF NEW YORK

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of THE AMES COMPANIES OF NEW YORK in 29 CLIFTON STREET, UNADILLA, NY 13849 (NAICS 321999). OSHA activity number 341489292.

Watch THE Ames Companies OF NEW York — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for THE Ames Companies OF NEW York is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
29 CLIFTON STREET
City
UNADILLA
State
NY
ZIP
13849
Mailing
P.O. BOX 644, UNADILLA, NY 13849
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
321999
Employees
18
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Open-sided floors and/or platforms four feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level were not guarded with standard railings (or equivalent) and toeboards:  Note:  Toeboards are only required when persons can pass, there is moving equipment or there is equipment with which falling materials could create a hazard.      a)  Debarker Area, on or about 5/18/16:  At the Debarker fall protection was not provided for employees who perform maintenance activities.  Employees are exposed to an approximate 7 foot fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $6000

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:    a)  Pallet Area, on or about 5/18/16:  Powermatic drill press was not equipped with a guard to prevent contact with the rotating chuck and tool.    b)  Pallet Area, on or about 5/18/16:  Jet drill press was not equipped with a guard to prevent contact with the rotating chuck and tool.      c)  Pallet Area, on or about 5/18/16:  Delta drill press was not equipped with a guard to prevent contact with the rotating chuck and tool.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $6000

1910.265 C18 I

Serious Gravity 5 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $6000.00 · Current $4200.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.265(c)(18)(i): 29 CFR 1910.265(c)(18)(i):  Construction, operation, and maintenance of conveyors were not in accordance with American National Standard B20.1-1957:      a)  Mill on or about 5/18/16:   The Ripsaw operator was exposed to an unguarded chain and sprocket that was located just below the operators work station.      b)  Mill, on or about 5/18/16:  Dowel slotted conveyor was not provided with a guard over the rotating end shaft.    c)  Mill, on or about 5/18/16:  Dowel slotted conveyor was not provided with guarding over the nip points where the belt and roller meet.      d)  Mill, on or about 5/18/16:  Second rip line conveyor belt was not provided guarding over the nip points where the belt and roller meet.    e)  Mill, on or about 5/16/16:  Crossovers were not provided where employees were stepping 3 feet over the log haul to access a work platform and stair unit.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4200
  • — Z (S) $6000

1910.265 C30 II

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.265(c)(30)(ii): Vehicle(s) were not equipped with audible warning signal(s ):    a)  Outside Mill, on or about 5/18/16:  CAT 924F Loader did not have audible warning signals in that the horn and backup alarm were not working.    b)  Outside Mill, on or about 5/18/16:  CAT 1T18F Loader did not have audible warning signals in that the horn and backup alarm were not working.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3500
  • — Z (S) $5000

1904.39 A02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Penalty
Initial $5000.00 · Current $3500.00 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.39(a)(2): The employer failed to report the in-patient hospitalization of one or more employees or an employee's amputation or an employee's loss of an eye, as a result of a work-related incident, within (24) twenty-four hours:    a)  The Ames Companies of New York, on or about 5/18/16:  The employer failed to report an employee's left finger tip amputation injury that occurred on 4/15/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3500
  • — Z (O) $5000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341489292.