Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: ONE WAY PAINTING AND ROOFING

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ONE WAY PAINTING AND ROOFING in CORNER GARFIELD/MILLER STREETS BUILDING 43, FALL RIVER, MA 02720 (NAICS 236118). OSHA activity number 341492890.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ONE WAY Painting and Roofing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ONE WAY Painting and Roofing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
CORNER GARFIELD/MILLER STREETS BUILDING 43
City
FALL RIVER
State
MA
ZIP
02720
Mailing
44 SPRINGVALE AVENUE, LYNN, MA 01904
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236118
Employees
9
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,989 · Current $4,989
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  Worksite: In the following instances where employees were re-shingling roofs, the employer did not ensure that employees were adequately protected against falls to the ground below by guardrail systems, safety net systems, or the proper use of personal fall arrest systems:  1) Miller Street, Bldg. 43: An employee straddling the corner of a roof was not protected from falls in excess of 10 feet to the ground below by the proper use of a harness and lanyard system.  The worker wore a harness but was not connected to a lanyard that would stop a fall to the ground below;  2) Corner of Garfield and Miller Streets, Building 18A: Two employees conducting roofing activities were not protected from falls in excess of 10 feet above ground level.  The employees wore harnesses but these were not connected to lanyards that would stop a fall to the ground below.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4989

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341492890.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.