Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: BAY PARK CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHAB LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of BAY PARK CENTER FOR NURSING AND REHAB LLC in 801 CO-OP CITY BLVD, BRONX, NY 10475 (NAICS 623110). OSHA activity number 341506483.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch BAY Park Center for Nursing and Rehab LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for BAY Park Center for Nursing and Rehab LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
801 CO-OP CITY BLVD
City
BRONX
State
NY
ZIP
10475
Mailing
801 CO-OP CITY BLVD, BRONX, NY 10475
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
623110
Employees
540
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2016
Abate by
Dec 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,057 · Current $4,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.133(a)(1): Protective eye equipment was not required where there was a reasonable probability of injury that could be prevented by such equipment:    a) Dietary Department:  Employees handling, pouring and using various hazardous chemicals including but not limited to:  Santec Zero (uronium hydrogen sulphate),  Santec Three (sodium hypochlorite), Santec Six (sodium hydroxide), Santec Eight (Alkyl Dimethyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride), etc. and the employer did not require employees to use appropriate eye protection (e.g., chemical splash goggles or equivalent); on or about 5/24/16.    b) Housekeeping Department:  Employees sprayed a 50 percent strength bleach solution  (sodium hypochlorite) to clean toilets in residents rooms' and the employer did not select and require the use of appropriate eye protection (e.g., chemical splash goggles or equivalent); on or about 7/15/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4250
  • · Z (S) $6057

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2016
Abate by
Dec 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,057 · Current $4,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances and chemical burns:     a) Dietary Department:  Employees handling, pouring and using various hazardous chemicals including but not limited to:  Santec Zero (uronium hydrogen sulphate),  Santec Three (sodium hypochlorite), Santec Six (sodium hydroxide), Santec Eight (Alkyl Dimethyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride), etc. and the employer did not select and require the use of chemical resistant gloves (e.g., nitrile gloves or equivalent); on or about 5/24/16.    b) Housekeeping Department:  Employees sprayed a 50 percent strength bleach solution to clean toilets in residents rooms and the employer did not select and require the use of chemical resistant gloves (e.g., nitrile gloves or equivalent); on or about 7/15/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4250
  • · Z (S) $6057

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2016
Abate by
Dec 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,057 · Current $4,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where employees were exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use:    a) Dietary Department:  Employees handling, pouring and using various hazardous chemicals including but not limited to:  Santec Zero (uronium hydrogen sulphate),  Santec Three (sodium hypochlorite), Santec Six (sodium hydroxide), Santec Eight (Alkyl Dimethyl Benzyl Ammonium Chloride), etc. and  suitable facilities (e.g., an emergency eyewash) for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes were not provided within the work area for immediate emergency use; on or about 5/24/16.    b) Housekeeping Storage Area:  An employee poured a full-strength bleach solution  (sodium hypochlorite) into spray bottles  employer did not select and require the use of appropriate eye protection (e.g., an emergency eyewash); on or about 7/15/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4250
  • · Z (S) $6057

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2016
Abate by
Dec 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $6,057 · Current $4,250 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:    a)  Dietary Department:  Employees handling, pouring and spraying various hazardous chemicals including but not limited to:   Santec Zero, Santec Red,  Santec 3, etc. were not trained on the physical and health hazards of these chemicals; on or about 5/24/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $4250
  • · Z (S) $6057

1904.7 B03

Other-than-serious 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2016
Abate by
Dec 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $850 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1904.7(a): The employer did not record workplace injuries and illnesses that would be considered to meet the general recording criteria, and therefore to be recordable, if it results in any of the following: death, days away from work, restricted work or transfer to another job, medical treatment beyond first aid, or loss of consciousness:    a) Entire Facility:  The following work-related injuries were not recorded on the OSHA-300 log on or about 6/14/16:        1. An employee fell, dislocating her shoulder on or about 1/25/16.        2. An employee fell, injuring her ankle on or about 5/23/16.        3. An employee was kicked by resident, resulting in deep bruises and contusions on or about 5/31/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $500
  • · Z (O) $850

1910.141 A03 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2016
Abate by
Dec 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.141(a)(3)(i): All places of employment were not kept clean to the extent that the nature of the work allowed:  a) 5th Floor - Soiled Utility Room:   Employees used a toilet located immediately next to containers of biohazardous waste in red bags; on or about 7/15/16.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1030 H01 II B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 146 exposed
Issued
Nov 21, 2016
Abate by
Dec 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $850 · Current $500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1030(h)(1)(ii)(B): The employer did not maintain a copy of each employee's hepatitis B vaccination status, including the dates of all the hepatitis B vaccinations or any medical records relative to the employee's ability to receive vacination as required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2).    a)  Entire Facility:    On or about 5/24/16; The facility did not maintain medical records that included the hepatitis B vaccination status, including the dates of all the hepatitis B vaccinations or any medical records relative to the ability to receive the vaccination as required by 29 CFR 1910.1030(f)(2) for RNs, LPNs, CNAs and Housekeeping Staff.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $500
  • · Z (O) $850

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341506483.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.