Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: RAFAEL VILLONUEVO

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of RAFAEL VILLONUEVO in 87 BAKER STREET, LYNN, MA 01901 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 341508067.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rafael Villonuevo for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rafael Villonuevo is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RAFAEL VILLONUEVO
Site address
87 BAKER STREET
City
LYNN
State
MA
ZIP
01901
Mailing
855 SARATOGA STREET, EAST BOSTON, MA 02128
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 B05 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): Each platform greater than 10 feet in length shall not extend over its support more than 18 inches (46 cm), unless it is designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilevered end.  (a) Location -87 Baker St., Lynn MA:,  On or about 05/27/2016, a scaffold platform extended beyond its support at least 18 inches.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3741

1926.451 C02 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(i): Footings were not level, sound, rigid, and capable of supporting the loaded scaffold without settling or displacement:   (a) Location -87 Baker St., Lynn MA: On or about 05/27/2016,  the poles of an aluminum pump jack scaffolding system that employees were working from were not erected plumb and level.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F03

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,742 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:   (a) Location -87 Baker St., Lynn MA: On or about 05/27/2016, a competent person did not perform an inspections of the scaffold to identify visible defects; such as scaffolding not braced according to the manufacturer specifications and scaffolding system erected within the approach distance of a 4000 volt power-line network.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3742

1926.451 F06

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(6): Scaffolds were erected, used, dismantled, altered, or moved such that they, or any conductive material handled on them, could have come closer than the minimum distances established for specific voltages as set forth in the table in subparagraph (f)(6).Note:  Specify distances as indicated in table in paragraph (f)(6) of this section.   (a) Location -87 Baker St., Lynn MA: On or about 05/27/2016, pump jack scaffolds systems were erected where the scaffolds came within the minimum approach distance for an energized 4000 V power-line network.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:; Such activities were not performed only by experienced and trained employees selected for such work by the competent person.   (a) Location -87 Baker St., Lynn MA: On or about 05/27/2016, a competent person did not perform an inspections of the scaffold(s) to identify visible defects; such as the scaffolding not braced according to the manufacturer specifications, planks which extended over there bears beyond the requirements, planks which overlapped incorrectly according to the manufacturer and scaffolding system erected within the approach distance of a 4000 volt power-line network.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet (3.1m) above a lower level was not protected from falling to that lower level by fall protection established in accordance with paragraphs (g)(1)(i) through (vii) of this section:   (a) Location -87 Baker St., Lynn MA: On or about 05/27/2016, employees were not protected from falling while working from a scaffold that was greater than 25 feet above a lower level, the end rails were missing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3741

1926.452 J02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Aug 9, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,742 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.452(j)(2): Poles of pump jack scaffold(s) were not secured to the structure by rigid triangular bracing, or equivalent, at the bottom, top and other points as necessary:   (a) Location -87 Baker St., Lynn MA: On or about 05/27/2016, , pump jack scaffold poles were not secured at the bottom.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3742

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341508067.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.