LIVERPOOL, NY ·
OSHA Inspection: VERNON O'DONNELL
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VERNON O'DONNELL in 506 VINE STREET, LIVERPOOL, NY 13088 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341510089.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VERNON O'DONNELL
- Site address
- 506 VINE STREET
- City
- LIVERPOOL
- State
- NY
- ZIP
- 13088
- Mailing
- 310 LONG BRANCH ROAD, SYRACUSE, NY 13209
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Oct 24, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: a) At the facility, on or about 10/24/2016: The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Items 2a issued on May 24, 2016. An abatement demand letter was sent to the employer on September 30, 2016. Abatement documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $400
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Employees were capping the ridge at the north side of the house with a pitch of 8:12 and a ground to ridge distance of approximately 40-feet. The workers removed the anchor points from the ridge and did not established a new one to be connected at all time, employees exposed to a fall hazard. b) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Employee was installing roof shingles at the west side of the house porch area with a ground to eave distance of approximately 9-feet and the worker was not provided with any type of fall protection, employee exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 26, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: a) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Workers were installing the roof shingles at heights ranging from 9-20-feet above the lower working level without fall protection and fall protection training was not provided to them.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1200
- · Z (S) $2000
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2016
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Employees were using a ladder located at the north side of the house to access the roof with a ground to eave distance of approximately 20-feet and the ladder was not extended 3-feet above the landing surface, employees are exposed to a fall hazard. b) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Employees were using a ladder located at the west side of the house to access the porch area with a ground to eave distance of approximately 9-feet and the ladder was not extended 3-feet above the landing surface, employees are exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1680
- · Z (S) $2800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in NY
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341510089.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.