Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: VERNON O'DONNELL

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of VERNON O'DONNELL in 506 VINE STREET, LIVERPOOL, NY 13088 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341510089.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vernon O'Donnell for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vernon O'Donnell is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VERNON O'DONNELL
Site address
506 VINE STREET
City
LIVERPOOL
State
NY
ZIP
13088
Mailing
310 LONG BRANCH ROAD, SYRACUSE, NY 13209
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Deleted Other-than-serious 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Oct 24, 2016
Abate by
Nov 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  a) At the facility, on or about 10/24/2016:  The employer did not provide abatement certification for Citation 1, Items 2a issued on May 24, 2016.  An abatement demand letter was sent to the employer on September 30, 2016.  Abatement documentation is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $400

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2016
Abate by
Jun 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):    a) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Employees were capping the ridge at the north side of the house with a pitch of 8:12 and a ground to ridge distance of approximately 40-feet. The workers removed the anchor points from the ridge and did not established a new one to be connected at all time, employees  exposed to a fall hazard.     b) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Employee was installing roof shingles at the west side of the house porch area with a ground to eave distance of approximately 9-feet and the worker was not provided with any type of fall protection, employee exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2016
Abate by
Jul 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:     a) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Workers were installing the roof shingles at heights ranging from 9-20-feet above the lower working level without fall protection and fall protection training was not provided to them.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 8, 2016
Abate by
Jun 20, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed:    a) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Employees were using a ladder located at the north side of the house to access the roof with a ground to eave distance of approximately 20-feet and the ladder was not extended 3-feet above the landing surface, employees are exposed to a fall hazard.     b) 506 Vine Street, on or about 5/27/2016: Employees were using a ladder located at the west side of the house to access the porch area with a ground to eave distance of approximately 9-feet and the ladder was not extended 3-feet above the landing surface, employees are exposed to a fall hazard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341510089.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.