Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: INTEGRATED TURF SOLUTIONS, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of INTEGRATED TURF SOLUTIONS, LLC in 170 RICE AVE., DADEVILLE, AL 36853 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 341516482.

Watch Integrated Turf Solutions, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Integrated Turf Solutions, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
170 RICE AVE.
City
DADEVILLE
State
AL
ZIP
36853
Mailing
550 LONG POINT RD. SUITE 205, MOUNT PLEASANT, SC 29464
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
60
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $11,224 · Current $11,224

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  a)    Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee working in the texturizing area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 248.8% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 96.6 dBa) which is approximately 2.493 times the permissible exposure level of 100% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 90 dBa) and the employer did not have a written hearing conservation program in place.    b)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee in the extruder area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 74.7% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 87.9 dBa) which is approximately 1.494 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer did not have a written hearing conservation program in place.    c)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee in the extruder area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 93.5% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 89.5 dBa) which is approximately 1.87 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer did not have a written hearing conservation program in place.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $11224

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:   a)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee working in the texturizing area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 248.8% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 96.6 dBa) which is approximately 2.493 times the permissible exposure level of 100% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 90 dBa) and the employer had not developed a monitoring program to ensure employees were adequately protected from noise.    b)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee in the extruder area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 74.7% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 87.9 dBa) which is approximately 1.494 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer had not developed a monitoring program to ensure employees were adequately protected from noise.    c)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee in the extruder area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 93.5% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 89.5 dBa) which is approximately 1.87 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer had not developed a monitoring program to ensure employees were adequately protected from noise.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 G01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(g)(1): The employer did not establish and maintain an audiometric testing program as provided by 29 CFR 1910.95(g) by making audiometric testing available to all employees whose exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels:  a)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee working in the texturizing area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 248.8% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 96.6 dBa) which is approximately 2.493 times the permissible exposure level of 100% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 90 dBa) and the employer did not establish an audiometric testing program to evaluate the employees hearing.   b)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee in the extruder area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 74.7% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 87.9 dBa) which is approximately 1.494 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer did not establish an audiometric testing program to evaluate the employees hearing.    c)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee in the extruder area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 93.5% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 89.5 dBa) which is approximately 1.87 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer did not establish an audiometric testing program to evaluate the employees hearing.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.95 K01

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 81108111

29 CFR 1910.95(k)(1): The employer did not train each employee who is exposed to noise at or above an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.95(k):  a)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee working in the texturizing area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 248.8% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 96.6 dBa) which is approximately 2.493 times the permissible exposure level of 100% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 90 dBa) and the employer did not train employees upon initial assignment and annually thereafter.    b)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee in the extruder area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 74.7% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 87.9 dBa) which is approximately 1.494 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer did not train employees upon initial assignment and annually thereafter.    c)   Facility: On or about June 14, 2016: an employee in the extruder area was exposed to continuous noise at a level of 93.5% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 89.5 dBa) which is approximately 1.87 times the action level of 50% (equivalent to an 8 hour TWA of 85dBa) and the employer did not train employees upon initial assignment and annually thereafter.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 60 exposed
Issued
Oct 3, 2016
Abate by
Oct 28, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1):  Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area.     a)  Facility: On or about May 26, 2016 and at times prior; the employer exposed employees to hazards related to chemicals used on site including but not limited to the base materials used in the turf making process without training employees in the required element of the hazard communication standard including those element required under the global harmonization revisions to the standard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Integrated Turf Solutions, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341516482.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.