Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: APPLIED RITE ROOFING OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of APPLIED RITE ROOFING OF CENTRAL FLORIDA, INC. in 500 ATLANTIC BLVD, NEPTUNE BEACH, FL 32266 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341518686.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Applied Rite Roofing of Central Florida, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Applied Rite Roofing of Central Florida, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
500 ATLANTIC BLVD
City
NEPTUNE BEACH
State
FL
ZIP
32266
Mailing
256 BUTTONWOOD AVE, WINTER SPRINGS, FL 32708
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.501 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(1): Each employee on a working/walking surface (horizontal and vertical surface) with an unprotected side or edge which was 6 feet ( 1.8m ) or more above a lower level was not protected from falling by the use of guardrail systems, safety net systems, or personal fall arrest systems:  a. On June 2, 2016, on the 2nd floor near the door, there was a floor opening that was 13 feet long and 4 feet wide that did not have an adequate fall protection system in that the opening had caution tape instead of a guardrail, exposing employees to a 10 feet fall hazard.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

1926.501 B10

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,700 · Current $1,700
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(10): Each employee engaged in roofing activities on low-sloped roofs with unprotected sides and edges 6 feet (1.8m) or  more above lower levels was not protected from falling by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or a combination of warning line systems and guardrail systems, warning line systems and safety net systems, or warning line systems and personal fall arrest systems, or warning line systems and safety monitoring systems:  a. On June 2, 2016, on the flat roof, two employees performing roofing work were not protected from a 15 feet fall hazard by the use of a fall protection system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1700

1926.1051 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 23, 2016
Abate by
Jun 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,360 · Current $1,360
29 CFR 1926.1051(a): 29 CFR 1926.1051(a):  Stairways or ladders were not provided at all personnel points of access where there was a break in elevation of 19 inches (48 cm) or more, and no ramp, runway, sloped embankment, or personnel hoist was provided:  a. On June 2, 2016, on the flat roof, there were two areas that had a break in elevation about 5 feet in which employees had to jump up and down to gain access to the adjacent roof.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1360

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341518686.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.