Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: EL-NA DAIRY, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of EL-NA DAIRY, LLC in E4029 PHEASANT RD., ALGOMA, WI 54201 (NAICS 112120). OSHA activity number 341524973.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch El-Na Dairy, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for El-Na Dairy, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
EL-NA DAIRY, LLC
Site address
E4029 PHEASANT RD.
City
ALGOMA
State
WI
ZIP
54201
Mailing
E4029 PHEASANT RD., ALGOMA, WI 54201
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
112120
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to corrosive chemicals:    (a)  On or about June 2, 2016 through June 30, 2016 in the milking parlor, employees were exposed to severe burn hazards to their eyes and face when they transferred and used Foam-Brite Acid Detergent and Foam-Kleen Chlorinated Alkaline Cleaner to clean and sanitize the floors and walls without wearing any appropriate eye or face protection.    (b)  On or about June 2, 2016 through June 30, 2016 in the milking parlor, employees were exposed to severe burn hazards to their eyes and face when they utilized high pressure spray to wash down the floors and walls after applying Foam-Brite Acid Detergent and Foam-Kleen Chlorinated Alkaline Cleaner without wearing any appropriate eye or face protection.     (c)  On or about June 2, 2016 through June 30, 206 in the milking parlor, employees were exposed to severe burn hazards to their eyes and face when they transferred and used FC-298 CIP Acid Cleaner, S-6000 Chlorinated CIP Cleaner, FS-100 Liquid Sanitizer, and Task Force Alkaline CIP Cleaner to sanitize and clean the calf feeder tank without wearing any appropriate eye or face protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to fall hazards:    (a)  On or about June 27, 2016 through June 30, 2016 in the manure reception room, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12' into an unguarded manure reception pit.    (b)  On or about June 27, 2016 through June 30, 2016 in the sand recovery room, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 12' into an unguarded manure reception pit.    (c)  On or about June 2, 2016 through June 30, 2016 in the maintenance shop, employees were exposed to fall hazards of approximately 9' from an unguarded mezzanine storage area.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Agriculture Reference: 1928.21(a)(5))    The employer did not develop, and implement a written hazard communication program addressing employee training, chemical labeling and maintenance of safety data sheets when working with hazardous chemicals such as Foam Brite Acid Detergent, Foam-Kleen Chlorinated Alkaline Cleaner, FC-298 CIP Acid Cleaner, S-6000 Chlorinated CIP Cleaner, FS-100 Liquid Sanitizer, and Task Force Alkaline CIP Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.1200 F06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): The employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with the information specified under paragraphs (f)(6)(i) through (ii) of this section:  (a)  The employer did not ensure that diesel fuel in a parts washer located in the maintenance shop was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity and hazards of its contents.  (b)  The employer did not ensure that a one gallon bottle of FS-100 chlorine located in the milking parlor was labeled, tagged, or marked with the identity of the hazards of its contents.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 G08

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8):   The employer did not maintain in the workplace copies of the required safety data sheets for each hazardous chemical  The employer did not maintain safety data sheets in the workplace for the hazardous chemicals they used such as Foam Brite Acid Detergent, Foam-Kleen Chlorinated Alkaline Cleaner, FC-298 CIP Acid Cleaner, S-6000 Chlorinated CIP Cleaner, FS-100 Liquid Sanitizer, and Task Force Alkaline CIP Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Agriculture Reference: 1928.21(a)(5))  The employer did not train employees on the hazardous chemicals they used such as Foam Brite Acid Detergent, Foam-Kleen Chlorinated Alkaline Cleaner, FC-298 CIP Acid Cleaner, S-6000 Chlorinated CIP Cleaner, FS-100 Liquid Sanitizer, and Task Force Alkaline CIP Cleaner.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1928.51 D

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1928.51(d): Every employee who operates an agricultural tractor was not informed of operating practices contained in Appendix A of this part and of any other practices dictated by the work environment.    Employees who operated agricultural tractors were not provided initial and annual training on safe operating practices when performing field work, feeding and cleaning, manure handling, and horizontal bunker silo compaction.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $2000

1928.57 A06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 26, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,300 Reduced
29 CFR 1928.57(a)(6): At the time of initial assignment, and at least annually thereafter, the employer did not instruct every employee in the safe operation and servicing of all covered equipment with which he was or would be involved:    The employer did not train employees in the safe operation and servicing of farmstead and farm field equipment including the requirements to disconnect power sources, lockout out electrical power, ensure everyone is clear of machinery, and ensure guards are in place when operating equipment throughout the farm.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1300
  • · Z (S) $2000

1928.57 B01 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1928.57(b)(1)(i): Power take-off shafts, including rear, mid- or side-mounted shafts, were not guarded by either a master shield, as provided in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or by other protective guarding:  On or about June 2, 2016, a power take-off shaft powering a Jay-Lor 4850 feed mixer did not have adequate guarding to prevent employee contact with positively driven rotating members of the power drive system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341524973.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.