Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RENAISSANCE STUCCO AND STONE

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RENAISSANCE STUCCO AND STONE in 19707 I10 WEST, SAN ANTONIO, TX 78257 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341540904.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Renaissance Stucco and Stone for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Renaissance Stucco and Stone is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
19707 I10 WEST
City
SAN ANTONIO
State
TX
ZIP
78257
Mailing
6426 DEW DR., SAN ANTONIO, TX 78239
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 F07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 6, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered, by trained and experienced employees under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration::  On or about June 10, 2016, employees were exposed to a fall hazard over 10 feet in height to unpaved ground level below while laying stone from a scaffold that was not assembled under the supervision of a competent person and lacked toe boards and guardrails for fall protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms before being released for use by employees other than erection/dismantling crews:   On or about June 10, 2016, an employee was exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet in height to unpaved ground level below while laying stone from a scaffold that did not have guardrails installed on the sides.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

1926.451 G04 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 1, 2016
Abate by
Jul 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(iv): Midrails were not installed at a height approximately midway between the top edge of the guardrail system and the platform surface:  On or about June 10, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards greater than 10 feet in height to ground level below while laying stone from a scaffold that did not have mid rails installed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1000
  • · Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341540904.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.