Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: MIW CORPORATION

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of MIW CORPORATION in 1205 BAY STREET, FALL RIVER, MA 02724 (NAICS 331210). OSHA activity number 341550549.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch MIW Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for MIW Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MIW CORPORATION
Site address
1205 BAY STREET
City
FALL RIVER
State
MA
ZIP
02724
Mailing
1205 BAY STREET, FALL RIVER, MA 02724
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331210
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.147 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): The employer did not establish a program consisting of an energy control procedure, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performed any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative:  Worksite:  The employer did not develop a written lockout tagout program, did not develop lockout tagout procedures, and did not train employees. The company has iron workers, punches, press brakes, a shear, band saws, and a rolling machine.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2016
Abate by
Sep 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  Worksite:  The employer did not train forklift operators.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2016
Abate by
Sep 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been  taken out of service until restored to safe operating conditions:  Yard:  1) The two rear tires of the Toyota Forklift were damaged.   2) The backup alarm of the Toyota Forklift was disconnected.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 3 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks:  Shop:  1) The clamps of the Cincinnati Shear were not guarded.  2) The points of operation of the two press brakes were not guarded or in the alternative the employer did not develop a safe distance program.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000
  • — Z (S) $2000

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2016
Abate by
Sep 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $800 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i): Except as elsewhere required or permitted by Subpart S of Part 1910, live parts of electric equipment operating  at 50 volts or more were not guarded against accidental contact by use of approved cabinets or other forms of approved enclosures or by any of the means identified in paragraphs (A), (B), (C), and (D) of 29 CFR 1910.303(g)(2)(i):  Center of the Shop:  Live buss bar parts were exposed at an unfilled opening at the electrical panel for the crane.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $800
  • — Z (S) $1600

1910.219 D01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 19, 2016
Abate by
Sep 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o):  Shop:  The pulley and belt drive of the Verson Press Brake was not completely enclosed by a guard.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341550549.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.