Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: BUEDEL FINE MEATS

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of BUEDEL FINE MEATS in 7661 S. 78TH AVENUE, BRIDGEVIEW, IL 60455 (NAICS 311612). OSHA activity number 341552792.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Buedel Fine Meats for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Buedel Fine Meats is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BUEDEL FINE MEATS
Site address
7661 S. 78TH AVENUE
City
BRIDGEVIEW
State
IL
ZIP
60455
Mailing
7661 S. 78TH AVENUE, BRIDGEVIEW, IL 60455
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311612
Employees
50
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,500 · Current $3,500
29 CFR 1910.23(c)(1): Every open-sided floor or platform 4 feet or more above adjacent floor or ground level shall be guarded by a standard railing (or the equivalent as specified in paragraph (e)(3) of this section) on all open sides except where there is entrance to a ramp, stairway, or fixed ladder. The railing shall be provided with a toeboard wherever, beneath the open sides,  a. On or about June 13, 2016, in the work area, employees were required to access the top of the Dry H Cooler to store various products.   There was no standard railing to protect employees from falling approximately 8 feet. Employees were thereby exposed to the hazards associated with falls.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $3500

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer shall administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program, as described in paragraphs (c) through (o) of this section, whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent. For purposes of the hearing conservation program, employee noise exposures shall be computed in accordance with appendix A and Table G-16a, and without regard to any attenuation provided by the use of personal protective equipment.   e. An employee in the production area was exposed to continuous noise at 73.2% of the permissible daily dose level, when measured with a 80 dB threshold, or equivalent sound level of approximately 87.7 dBA for the 414 minute sampling time on June 14,  2016. Exposure calculation included a zero increment for the 66 minutes not sampled.   The employer had not implemented a continuing, effective hearing conservation program
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.151 C

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
29 CFR 1910.151(c): Where the eyes or body of any person may be exposed to injurious corrosive materials, suitable facilities for quick drenching or flushing of the eyes and body shall be provided within the work area for immediate emergency use.  [63 FR 33450, June 18, 1998]     a. On or about June 13, 2016, in the meat opening area, employees required to work with lactic acid solution, were not provided with suitable facilities for flushing of the eyes.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $4,900
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices, electronic safety devices, etc.  a.   On or about June 13, 2016,  in the production area, the employer did not adequately guard the Tiromat machine exposing employees to the point of operation.  Employees were exposed to pinch point hazards.   b.   On or about June 13, 2016,  in the production area, the employer did not adequately guard the Bird Tenderizing "cubing" machine exposing employees to the rotating parts.  Employees were exposed to crushing hazards.   c.   On or about June 13, 2016, the employer did not ensure the guard was adjusted to protect employees from coming in contact with unused portion of the blade on the AEW Delford systems vertical band saw. Employees were exposed to lacerations and amputations.  d.  On or about June 13, 2016, in the production area,  the employer did not provide a guard to protect employees from coming in contact with the rotating auger on the Patty Machine.  Employees were exposed to fractures and lacerations.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employers shall provide employees with effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment, and whenever a new physical or health hazard the employees have not previously been trained about is introduced into their work area. Information and training may be designed to cover categories of hazards (e.g., flammability, carcinogenicity) or specific chemicals. Chemical-specific information must always be available through labels and material safety data sheets.    a. On or about June 13, 2016, in the work area, the employees were not adequately trained in the hazards associated with chemicals such as, but not limited to, carbon dioxide and lactic acid.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2100

1910.37 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 40 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.37(b)(1): Each exit route must be adequately lighted so that an employee with normal vision can see along the exit route.  a. On or about June 13, 2016, in the production area, the emergency exit lights did not work.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.147 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(1): Energy control program. The employer shall establish a program consisting of energy control procedures, employee training and periodic inspections to ensure that before any employee performs any servicing or maintenance on a machine or equipment where the unexpected energizing, startup or release of stored energy could occur and cause injury, the machine or equipment shall be isolated from the energy source and rendered inoperative.   a. a. On or about June 13, 206, in the facility, employees  were required to perform set up activities and maintenance on the MultiVac and Triomat machines. The employer did not have a written lockout program which included energy control procedures and periodic inspections.  The employees were thereby exposed to the hazards associated with unexpected start up of machines and equipment.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341552792.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.