Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: QUICKLUBE NORTH OF DANVILLE, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of QUICKLUBE NORTH OF DANVILLE, INC. in 2710 N VERMILION, DANVILLE, IL 61832 (NAICS 811191). OSHA activity number 341553261.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Quicklube North of Danville, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Quicklube North of Danville, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2710 N VERMILION
City
DANVILLE
State
IL
ZIP
61832
Mailing
1006 W. CHESTNUT ST., HOOPESTON, IL 60942
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811191
Employees
35
Ownership type
Private (A)

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.23 A05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Every pit and floor opening was not adequately guarded by standard railing or any other effected means.     On or about June 10, 2016, employees working in the bays were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 4ft. 10in. and 7ft.1in., because the pit was not adequately guarded.  Every pit opening, infrequently used, was not guarded by a floor opening cover of standard strength and construction.  While the cover is not in place, the pit or trap opening was not constantly attended by someone or was not protected on all exposed sides by removable standard railings.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2450
  • · Z (S) $4900

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:      On or about June 10, 2016, employees were exposed to eye and skin irritation when using a variety of automotive oil and lubrication chemicals, and the employer did not provide the employees with hazard communication training.  This training would include the following:       Information:   a.      The requirements of this section,  b.      Any operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals were present, and   c.       The location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets.      Training:   a.      Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in their work area,  b.      The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in their work area,   c.       The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, and   d.      The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.132 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment.    On or about June 10, 2016, employees were required to wear personal protective equipment and the employer did not document the hazard assessment. The written certification did not include the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341553261.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.