DANVILLE, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: QUICKLUBE NORTH OF DANVILLE, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of QUICKLUBE NORTH OF DANVILLE, INC. in 2710 N VERMILION, DANVILLE, IL 61832 (NAICS 811191). OSHA activity number 341553261.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- QUICKLUBE NORTH OF DANVILLE, INC.
- Site address
- 2710 N VERMILION
- City
- DANVILLE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61832
- Mailing
- 1006 W. CHESTNUT ST., HOOPESTON, IL 60942
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 811191
- Employees
- 35
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.23 A05
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 24, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $2,450 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.23(a)(5): Every pit and floor opening was not adequately guarded by standard railing or any other effected means. On or about June 10, 2016, employees working in the bays were exposed to a fall hazard of approximately 4ft. 10in. and 7ft.1in., because the pit was not adequately guarded. Every pit opening, infrequently used, was not guarded by a floor opening cover of standard strength and construction. While the cover is not in place, the pit or trap opening was not constantly attended by someone or was not protected on all exposed sides by removable standard railings.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2450
- · Z (S) $4900
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: On or about June 10, 2016, employees were exposed to eye and skin irritation when using a variety of automotive oil and lubrication chemicals, and the employer did not provide the employees with hazard communication training. This training would include the following: Information: a. The requirements of this section, b. Any operations in their work area where hazardous chemicals were present, and c. The location and availability of the written hazard communication program, including the required list(s) of hazardous chemicals, and safety data sheets. Training: a. Methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in their work area, b. The physical and health hazards of the chemicals in their work area, c. The measures employees can take to protect themselves from these hazards, and d. The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1400
- · Z (S) $2800
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Jul 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer shall verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated; the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed; the date(s) of the hazard assessment; and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment. On or about June 10, 2016, employees were required to wear personal protective equipment and the employer did not document the hazard assessment. The written certification did not include the name of the person who certified that the evaluation had been performed and the date that the hazard assessment was completed.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 811191)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341553261.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.