Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,547Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-01 Last loaded 2026-09-04

OSHA Inspection: CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Fatality or catastrophe inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a fatality or catastrophe safety inspection of CORE MOLDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. in 800 MANOR PARK DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228 (NAICS 326199). OSHA activity number 341561066.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Core Molding Technologies, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Core Molding Technologies, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
800 MANOR PARK DRIVE
City
COLUMBUS
State
OH
ZIP
43228
Mailing
800 MANOR PARK DRIVE, COLUMBUS, OH 43228
Inspection type
Fatality or catastrophe (M)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Union (A)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
326199
Employees
300
Ownership type
Private (A)

2 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 5 13 instances 82 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Jul 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $9,799 · Current $12,471
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): Types of guarding. One or more methods of machine guarding shall be provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks. Examples of guarding methods are-barrier guards, two-hand tripping devices,electronic safety devices, etc.    a. On the front of press 201, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.     b. On the front of press 202, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    c. On the back of press 202, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    d. On the front of press 203, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    e. On the back of press 203, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    f. On the front of press 204, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    g. On the back of press 204, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    h. On the front of press 205, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    i. On the back of press 205, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    j. On the front of press 206, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    k. On the back of press 206, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    l. On the front of press 207, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left side and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.    m. On the back of press 207, there were no guards in place to prevent employees from reaching through the brackets of the light curtain on the left and accessing the moving parts of the upper portion of the press as it was closing.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $12471
  • · Z (S) $9799

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 10 14 instances 82 exposed
Issued
Nov 17, 2016
Abate by
Jul 31, 2017
Penalty
Initial $12,471 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): The point of operation of machines whose operation exposes an employee to injury, shall be guarded. The guarding device shall be in conformity with any appropriate standards therefor, or, in the absence of applicable specific standards, shall be so designed and constructed as to prevent the operator from having any part of his body in the danger zone during the operating cycle.    a. In the molding department, hydraulic press 208 did not have adequate point of operation guarding when employees had to walk into the press to load material and remove parts. The light curtains on the front and back of the press were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtains would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards while in the point of operation. On or about June 20, 2016, an employee was fatality crushed in the point of operation of press 208 while placing material in the mold and the operator began the press cycle.    b. In the molding department, hydraulic press 210 did not have adequate point of operation guarding when employees had to walk into the press to load material. The light curtains on the front and back of the press were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtains would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards while in the point of operation.    c. In the molding department, hydraulic press 211 did not have adequate point of operation guarding when employees had to walk into the press to load material and remove parts. The light curtains on the front and back of the press were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtains would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards while in the point of operation.    d. In the molding department, hydraulic press 215 did not have adequate point of operation guarding when employees had to walk into the press to load material and remove parts. The light curtains on the front and back of the press were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtains would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards while in the point of operation.    e. In the molding department, hydraulic press 216 did not have adequate point of operation guarding when employees had to walk into the press to load material and remove parts. The light curtains on the front and back of the press were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtains would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards while in the point of operation.    f. In the molding department, hydraulic press 217 did not have adequate point of operation guarding when employees had to walk into the press to load material and remove parts. The light curtains on the front and back of the press were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtains would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards while in the point of operation.    g. In the molding department, hydraulic press 219 did not have adequate point of operation guarding when employees had to walk into the press to load material and remove parts. The light curtains on the front and back of the press were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtains would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards while in the point of operation.    h. In the molding department, hydraulic press 201 did not have adequate point of operation guarding on the front when employees had to load material and remove parts. The light curtain was not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to it being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtain would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards at the point of operation.    i. In the molding department, hydraulic press 202 did not have adequate point of operation guarding on the front and back when employees had to load material and remove parts. The light curtains were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtain would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards at the point of operation.    j. In the molding department, hydraulic press 203 did not have adequate point of operation guarding on the front and back when employees had to load material and remove parts. The light curtains were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtain would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards at the point of operation.    k. In the molding department, hydraulic press 204 did not have adequate point of operation guarding on the front and back when employees had to load material and remove parts. The light curtains were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtain would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards at the point of operation.    l. In the molding department, hydraulic press 205 did not have adequate point of operation guarding on the front and back when employees had to load material and remove parts. The light curtains were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtain would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards at the point of operation.    m. In the molding department, hydraulic press 206 did not have adequate point of operation guarding on the front and back when employees had to load material and remove parts. The light curtains were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtain would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards at the point of operation.    n. In the molding department, hydraulic press 207 did not have adequate point of operation guarding on the front and back when employees had to load material and remove parts. The light curtains were not properly applied for point of operation guarding due to them being in automatic start mode. Once employees passed through the light beam the light curtain would automatically reset and the stop signal for the machine would no longer be present, thereby employees were exposed to crushing hazards at the point of operation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $12471

View Core Molding Technologies, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341561066.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.