Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
4,113,118Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-13 Last loaded 2026-07-17

OSHA Inspection: C & C SERVICE LLC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of C & C SERVICE LLC in 72 DYKE LANE, STAMFORD, CT 06902 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 341562593.

Watch C & C Service LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for C & C Service LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
C & C SERVICE LLC
Site address
72 DYKE LANE
City
STAMFORD
State
CT
ZIP
06902
Mailing
17 DAVENPORT STREET, STAMFORD, CT 06902
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238220
Employees
24
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 24 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $400.00 · Current $400.00
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  Location: 72 Dyke Lane, Stamford, CT 06902  Certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001, Citation 01, Item 002 and Citation 01, Item 003 was not received within 10 calendar days (by July 29, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 001 and July 18, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 002 and Citation 01, Item 003) after the abatement date (July 19, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 001 and July 8, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 002 and Citation 01, Item 003).
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  Jobsite: The employer did not ensure through providing training and evaluation that the employee operating the rough terrain forklift (PIT) was competent to operate the PIT safely at all times.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $1600.00 · Current $1600.00
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use:  Jobsite:  The rough terrain forklift that was not designed by the manufacturer to support scaffold platform was used to elevate and support a platform from which an employee was working.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1600

1926.451 G04 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Abate by
Penalty
Initial $2000.00 · Current $2000.00
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms.  Jobsite:  The open-sided platform that was supported by the forks of the rough terrain forklift and from which an employee was working was not guarded by the standard guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2000

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341562593.