STAMFORD, CT ·
OSHA Inspection: C & C SERVICE LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of C & C SERVICE LLC in 72 DYKE LANE, STAMFORD, CT 06902 (NAICS 238220). OSHA activity number 341562593.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C & C SERVICE LLC
- Site address
- 72 DYKE LANE
- City
- STAMFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06902
- Mailing
- 17 DAVENPORT STREET, STAMFORD, CT 06902
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238220
- Employees
- 24
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Sep 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 72 Dyke Lane, Stamford, CT 06902 Certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001, Citation 01, Item 002 and Citation 01, Item 003 was not received within 10 calendar days (by July 29, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 001 and July 18, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 002 and Citation 01, Item 003) after the abatement date (July 19, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 001 and July 8, 2016 for Citation 01, Item 002 and Citation 01, Item 003).
Recent events (1)
- · Z (O) $400
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 19, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): Jobsite: The employer did not ensure through providing training and evaluation that the employee operating the rough terrain forklift (PIT) was competent to operate the PIT safely at all times.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 C02 IV
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2)(iv): Front-end loaders and similar pieces of equipment were used to support scaffold platforms when they were not specifically designed by the manufacturer for such use: Jobsite: The rough terrain forklift that was not designed by the manufacturer to support scaffold platform was used to elevate and support a platform from which an employee was working.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $1600
1926.451 G04 I
- Issued
- Jun 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $2,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(4)(i): Guardrail systems were not installed along all open sides and ends of platforms. Jobsite: The open-sided platform that was supported by the forks of the rough terrain forklift and from which an employee was working was not guarded by the standard guardrail system.
Recent events (1)
- · Z (S) $2000
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238220)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341562593.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.