DURHAM, CT —
OSHA Inspection: C&M CONSTRUCTION LLC
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of C&M CONSTRUCTION LLC in 50 OLD FARMS ROAD, DURHAM, CT 06422 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341579035.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C&M CONSTRUCTION LLC
- Site address
- 50 OLD FARMS ROAD
- City
- DURHAM
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06422
- Mailing
- 88 MEDFORD STREET, BRISTOL, CT 06010
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Jan 11, 2017
- Abate by
- Jan 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: Location: 50 Old Farms Road, Durham, CT 06422 Certification and documentation for Citation 01, Item 001, Citation 01, Item 002a, Citation 01, Item 002b, and Citation 01, Item 003 was not received within 10 calendar days (by October 19, 2016) after the abatement date (October 4, 2016).
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,563 · Current $3,563
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents. WORKSITE: The employees, installing roof shingles with pneumatic nailing devices were not using eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3563
1926.451 G01 I
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,988 · Current $4,988
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system: WORKSITE: The employees, performing roofing activities from a ladder jack scaffold were not protected against the hazard of falling more than 13 feet to the ground by the use of appropriate fall protection systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4988
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): WORKSITE: The employees, performing roofing activities on the 6 in 12 pitch roof were not protected against the hazard of falling approximately 14 feet to the ground by the use of appropriate fall protection systems.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 4, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: WORKSITE: The side rails of the Werner Model D1332-2, 32-foot aluminum extension ladder used by employees to access the scaffold did not extend at least three feet above the walking/working surface of the ladder jack scaffold and no hand hold or equivalent was provided.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2138
More inspections at C&M Construction LLC
View C&M Construction LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341579035.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.