Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,193,745Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-06 Last loaded 2026-08-10

OSHA Inspection: TUPP SIGNS, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of TUPP SIGNS, INC. in 457 E. NEW CHURCHMAN ROAD, NEW CASTLE, DE 19720 (NAICS 339950). OSHA activity number 341592160.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tupp Signs, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tupp Signs, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
TUPP SIGNS, INC.
Site address
457 E. NEW CHURCHMAN ROAD
City
NEW CASTLE
State
DE
ZIP
19720
Mailing
457 E. NEW CHURCHMAN ROAD, NEW CASTLE, DE 19720
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
339950
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.102 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2016
Abate by
Nov 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,850 · Current $1,995 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.102(a):  Cylinders. Employers must ensure that the in-plant transfer, handling, storage, and use of acetylene in cylinders comply with the provisions of CGA Pamphlet G-1-2009 ("Acetylene") (Compressed Gas Association, Inc., 12th ed., 2009).    a) Tupp Signs, Inc. - On or about June 30, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that cylinders of acetylene were stored in accordance with Section 5.2 of CGA Pamphlet G-1-2009, in that unsecured empty acetylene cylinders and empty oxygen cylinders were stored within close proximity of each other and were not separated by 20 feet or a noncombustible partition with a one-hour fire resistance rating.    Abatement Note:  Storage of compressed gas cylinders shall comply NFPA 51, I-Codes, and 29 CFR.253.  In addition, practices in CGA P-1, Safe Handling of Compressed Gasses in Containers should be followed, including section 5.8.4 wherein it states that all compressed gas cylinders in service or in storage shall be secured to prevent falling or rolling.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1995
  • · Z (S) $2850

1910.134 F02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2016
Abate by
Nov 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,276 · Current $2,993 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:    (a) Tupp Signs Inc. - On or about June 30, 2016, the employer supplied his employees with a 3M, elastomeric, half-face, negative pressure respirators to be worn while performing spray painting operations without ensuring that fit testing was performed prior to any respirators being worn.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2993
  • · Z (S) $4276

1910.134 G01 I A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2016
Abate by
Nov 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  (a) Tupp Signs, Inc. - On or about June 30, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that employees wearing a tight-fitting 3M half-face elastomeric respirators did not have facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face while performing paint spraying operations.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 K03

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Oct 19, 2016
Abate by
Nov 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k)(3): Training was not provided prior to requiring employees to use a respirator in the workplace:  (a) Tupp Signs Inc. - On or about June 30, 2016, the employer did not provide respirator protection training to employees prior to requiring the use of respiratory protection during spray painting activities in the paint booth.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

View Tupp Signs, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341592160.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.