OSHA Inspection: LILES COLLISION SERVICE, INC.

Issued

Sep 20, 2016

Abate by

Dec 31, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a.  On or about June 30, 2016, spray painters were required to wear respirators while spray painting vehicles and parts inside the spray booths and the employer did not establish and implement a written respiratory protection program that addressed the worksite-specific procedures such as but not limited to employee medical evaluations, fit testing, and training on the use, maintenance and care of the respirator.

Issued

Sep 20, 2016

Abate by

Oct 17, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a.  On or about June 30, 2016, spray painters who were required to wear NIOSH approved half-face respirators while spray painting vehicles and parts inside the spray booths had not been provided with medical evaluations prior to wearing the respirators.

Issued

Sep 20, 2016

Abate by

Oct 17, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a.  On or about June 30, 2016, spray painters who were required to wear NIOSH approved half-face respirators while spray painting vehicles and parts inside the spray booths had not been fit tested prior to initial use of the respirators.

Issued

Sep 20, 2016

Abate by

Dec 31, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   a.  On or about June 30, 2016, the employer did not develop and implement the written hazard communication program which described how requirements of 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) would be met for employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to Ethyl Benzene, Xylene, n-Butyl Acetate, tert-Butyl Acetate, 1,6-Hexamethylene Diisocyanate Homopolymer and Hexamethylene Diisocyanate.

Issued

Sep 20, 2016

Abate by

Dec 31, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv):   The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation of the labels received on shipped containers and the workplace labeling system used by their employer; the safety data sheet, including the order of information and how employee could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information:  a.  On or about June 30, 2016, the employer did not include in the hazard communication program an explanation of the labeling system, safety data sheet, and training to employees who have exposure to hazardous materials such as but not limited to Ethyl Benzene, Xylene, n-Butyl Acetate, tert-Butyl Acetate, 1,6-Hexamethylene Diisocyanate Homopolymer and Hexamethylene Diisocyanate.