MIAMI, FL —
OSHA Inspection: BACHILLER IRON WORKS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of BACHILLER IRON WORKS, INC. in 295 N.E. 71 STREET, MIAMI, FL 33138 (NAICS 332323). OSHA activity number 341601391.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BACHILLER IRON WORKS, INC.
- Site address
- 295 N.E. 71 STREET
- City
- MIAMI
- State
- FL
- ZIP
- 33138
- Mailing
- 295 N.E. 71 STREET, MIAMI, FL 33138
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332323
- Employees
- 28
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed a caught by hazard: a. On or about July 13, 2016, at Bay #9 of the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a press brake (i.e. Chicago, no other information available) that did not have its pedal guarded from unintended operation. b. On or about July 13, 2016, at Bay #9 of the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a shear (i.e. Niagara, NR I-10) that did not have its pedals guarded from unintended operation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.101 B
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.101(b): The in-plant handling, storage, and utilization of all compressed gases in cylinders, portable tanks, rail tankcars, or motor vehicle cargo tanks were not in accordance with Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet P-1-1965, which is incorporated by reference as specified in CFR 1910.6: (Section 3.3.3: Do not store cylinders near elevators or gangways, or in locations where heavy moving objects may strike or fall on them. Where caps are provided for valve protection, such caps should be kept on cylinders in storage): On or about July 6, 2016 at the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to struck by, fire and explosion hazards as evidenced by, among other conditions: a. At Bay #2, a compressed gas cylinder (i.e. Argon) was not secured while placed in an area where it could be knocked over. b. At Bay #3, six compressed gas cylinders (i.e. Argon) were not secured while placed in an area where it could be knocked over, and two of them lacked a valve protection cap. c. At Bay #3, two compressed gas cylinders (i.e. Argon 75%, 25% Carbon Dioxide) were not secured while placed in an area where it could be knocked over, and one of them lacked a valve protection cap.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1620
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(1): One or more methods of machine guarding was not provided to protect the operator and other employees in the machine area from hazards such as those created by point of operation, ingoing nip points, rotating parts, flying chips and sparks: a. On or about July 6, 2016, at Bay #4 of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to caught and struck by hazards while working with a drill press (i.e. WI, Serial #274) that had its point of operation unguarded. b. On or about July 6, 2016, at Bay #5 of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to caught and struck by hazards while working with a drill press (i.e. Northern Industrial Tools, #155736) that had its point of operation unguarded. c. On or about July 13, 2016, at Bay #9 of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to caught and struck by hazards while working with a drill press (AB Arboga Maskiner, No. 166931, Type ER-825) that had its point of operation unguarded.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.212 A03 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(a)(3)(ii): Point(s) of operation of machinery were not guarded to prevent employee(s) from having any part of their body in the danger zone(s) during operating cycle(s): On or about July 13, 2016, at Bay #9 of the above addressed jobsite, employees were exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a press brake (i.e. Chicago, no other information available) without point of operation guarding and/or alternate measures which provide effective protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.212(b): Machine(s) designed for fixed location(s) were not securely anchored to prevent walking or moving: On or about July 6, 2016, at Bay #1 of above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a struck by hazard while working with a table saw (i.e. Ryobi, Model RTS10G) that was not anchored.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1620
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.213 D01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,700 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.213(d)(1): Circular handfed crosscut table saw(s) were not guarded by an automatically adjusting hood which completely enclosed that portion of the saw above the table and above the material being cut: On or about July 6, 2016, at Bay #1 of above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to a caught by hazard while working with a table saw (i.e. Ryobi, Model RTS10G) that lacked a guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2700
- — Z (S) $4500
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,700 · Current $1,620 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(d)(1): Pulley(s) with part(s) seven feet or less from the floor or work platform were not guarded in accordance with the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.219(m) and (o): On or about July 6, 2016, at Bay #4 of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to caught by hazard while working with a drill press (i.e. WI, Serial #274) that lacked a guard covering belt and pulleys of its drive mechanism.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1620
- — Z (S) $2700
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.219(e)(1)(i): Horizontal belts which had both runs seven feet or less from the floor level were not guarded with a guard that extended to at least fifteen inches above the belt: On or about July 6, 2016, at Bay #4 of the above addressed jobsite, an employee was exposed to caught by hazard while working with drill press (i.e. WI, Serial #274) that lacked a guard covering belt and pulleys of its drive mechanism.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.243 C03
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.243(c)(3): Abrasive wheels used on vertical portable grinder(s) (right angle head grinders) were not provided with safety guard(s) having a maximum exposure angle of 180 degrees and located between the operator and wheel: On or about July 6, 2016, at Bay #6 of the above addressed worksite, an employee was observed using a portable grinder (i.e. Dewalt DWE 402) without a guard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2160
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 8, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,600 · Current $2,160 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: On or about June 13, 2016 at Bay #4 of the above addressed worksite, a fan (i.e. Comfort Zone) lacked a ground prong on its attachment plug, exposing an employee to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2160
- — Z (S) $3600
1910.334 A02 II
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.334(a)(2)(ii): There was a defect or evidence of damage that could have exposed an employee to injury and the defective or damaged item was not removed from service: On or about July 6, 2016 at the above addressed worksite, portable extension cords were not visually inspected before use and removed from service, as evidenced by, among other conditions: a. At Bay #3, an extension cord was used which had its outer insulation broken and lacked a ground pin, exposing an employee to an electrical hazard. b. At Bay #8, an extension cord that was used to energize a fan had outer insulation broken, exposing employees to an electrical hazard.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(6): The employer did not ensure that all nameplates and markings were in place: On or about July 13, 2016, at the yard area of the above addressed worksite, employees were exposed to a struck by hazard while operating a powered industrial truck (i.e. Yale, no other information available) whose nameplate/markings were not legible.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): On or about July 13, 2016, at the yard area of the above addressed jobsite, an employee operated a powered industrial truck (i.e. Yale, no other information available) without being trained.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2016
- Abate by
- Aug 15, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(p)(1): Powered industrial truck(s) found to be in need of repair, defective, or in any way unsafe had not been taken out of service until restored to safe operating condition(s): On or about July 13, 2016, at the yard area of the above addressed jobsite, a powered industrial truck (i.e. Yale, no other information available) had its backup alarm inoperative and lacked one of the latches to secure the propane tank.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections at Bachiller Iron Works, INC.
View Bachiller Iron Works, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332323)
More inspections in FL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341601391.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.