Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RUCK ROOFING AND CONSTRUCTION

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RUCK ROOFING AND CONSTRUCTION in 20 SENTRY ROAD, YORK, ME 03909 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341611200.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ruck Roofing and Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ruck Roofing and Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
20 SENTRY ROAD
City
YORK
State
ME
ZIP
03909
Mailing
6 COUNTRY DRIVE, BIDDEFORD, ME 04005
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
9
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system:  Job Site - Employees were on ladder jack scaffolding over 12 feet above the ground and were not protected by a personal fall arrest system.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.1053 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(5)(i): Non-self-supporting ladders were not used at an angle such that the horizontal distance from the top support to the foot of the ladder was approximately one-quarter of the working length of the ladder (the distance along the ladder between the foot and the top support).  Job Site - The portable ladders supporting the ladder jack scaffolding were used at an angle such that the horizontal distance (ground from the garage to the bottom of the ladder) was greater than one-quarter of the working length of the ladder.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.1053 B08

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(8): Ladders placed in a location where they could be displaced by workplace activities or traffic, such as in passageways, doorways, or driveways, were not secured to prevent accidental displacement, nor was a barricade used to keep the activities or traffic away from the ladder.  Job Site - Portable ladders were placed in the driveway area of the residence and were not secured to prevent accidental displacement.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Ruck Roofing and Construction's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341611200.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.