Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: EMI CONSTRUCTION INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of EMI CONSTRUCTION INC. in 10812 ALVARA POINT DRIVE LOT 109, BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341621076.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch EMI Construction INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for EMI Construction INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
10812 ALVARA POINT DRIVE LOT 109
City
BONITA SPRINGS
State
FL
ZIP
34135
Mailing
5583 LEE STREET UNIT 5, LEHIGH ACRES, FL 33971
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
8
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 7 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,785 · Current $1,071 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  a.  At the jobsite, hard hats were not worn while employees were working from and around a two tiered scaffold. The employees were applying plaster to the exterior walls and they had buckets, hand tools, and equipment on the scaffolding, exposing employees to struck-by hazards, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1071
  • — Z (S) $1785

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):  a.  At the jobsite, scaffolding used while doing plastering work was not fully planked, exposing employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.451 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(2): Scaffold platforms and walkways were not at least 18 inches wide:  a.  At the jobsite, scaffolding planking used as a walkway and platform while doing plastering work was 9.5 inches wide, exposing employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B04

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(4): Each end of a platform, not cleated or otherwise restrained by hooks or equivalent means, did not extend over the centerline of its support at least 6 inches (15 cm):  a.  At the jobsite, scaffolding planking extended less than 3 inches from the support beam, exposing employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 B05 II

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(5)(ii): The end of a platform greater than 10 feet in length extended over its support more than 18 inches and the platform was not designed and installed so that the cantilevered portion of the platform is able to support employees without tipping, or has guardrails which block employee access to the cantilivered end:  a.  At the jobsite, the ends of scaffold planks extended 47-50 inches past the support beam and were not secured in place, exposing employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 C02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(c)(2): Supported scaffold poles, legs, posts, frames,  or uprights did not bear on base plates, mud sills or other adequate firm foundation:  a.  At the jobsite, the scaffolding being used while doing plastering work did not have mud sills or based plates, exposing employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used.  Crossbraces were used as a means of access:  a. At the jobsite, the cross braces on the tubular welded scaffolding were used to access different levels of the scaffolding, exposing employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680
  • — Z (S) $2800

1926.451 F03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(3): Scaffolds and scaffold components were not inspected for visible defects by a competent person before each work shift, and after any occurrence which could affect a scaffold's structural integrity:  a. At the jobsite, employees were allowed to work from tubular welded scaffolding that was not inspected for damage by a competent person, exposing the employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Aug 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:  a.  At the jobsite, fall protection was not provided to employees applying plaster while working from scaffolding, exposing employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

1926.454 B

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Jul 29, 2016
Abate by
Oct 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $2,520 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.454(b): The employer did not have each employee involved in erecting, disassembling, moving, operating, repairing, maintaining, or inspecting a scaffold trained by a competent person to recognize any hazards associated with the work in question:  a.  At the jobsite, employees were allowed to erect, move, and work on scaffolding and without being trained on how to recognize and handle the hazards of erecting, moving, and working with scaffolding, exposing the employees to a 14 foot fall hazard, on or about 7/14/2016.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2520
  • — Z (S) $4200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341621076.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.