Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: ARRAY COATING TECHNOLOGY, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ARRAY COATING TECHNOLOGY, LLC in 11987 FM 529, HOUSTON, TX 77041 (NAICS 332812). OSHA activity number 341622678.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Array Coating Technology, LLC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Array Coating Technology, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
11987 FM 529
City
HOUSTON
State
TX
ZIP
77041
Mailing
11987 FM 529, HOUSTON, TX 77041
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332812
Employees
9
Ownership type
Private (A)

7 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.94 A05 V

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $960 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.94(a)(5)(v): Operators were not equipped with heavy canvas or leather gloves and aprons or equivalent protection to protect them from the impact of abrasives.  On or about July 14, 2016, in the sandblasting area where employees were exposed struck-by hazards while sandblasting metal without wearing canvas or leather gloves and aprons or equivalent protection:
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $960
  • · Z (S) $1600

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $720 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace    On or about July 14, 2016, and at times prior thereto, when employees in the paint area were exposed to respiration hazards while wearing tight fitting half face respirators without having been medically evaluated.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $720
  • · Z (S) $1200

1910.178 M02

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,800 · Current $1,680 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(m)(2): Employee(s) stood under or passed under the elevated portion of a powered industrial truck:     a. On or about June 6, 2016, in the paint spray area where an employee was exposed to crushed-by hazards while painting the bottom of an RDC basket while standing under the elevated portion of a forklift holding the load.    b. On or about June 28, 2016, in the paint spray area where an employee was exposed to crushed-by hazards while painting the bottom of an RDC basket while standing under the elevated portion of a forklift holding the load.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1680
  • · Z (S) $2800

1910.184 I01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $1,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.184(i)(1): Synthetic web sling(s) were not marked or coded to show rated capacities for each type of hitch and type of synthetic web material:    On or about July 14, 2016, in the sand blasting and staging areas where employees were exposed to crushed-by and struck-by hazards while using a synthetic web sling without legible markings to indicate rated capacities.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1200
  • · Z (S) $2000

1910.184 I09 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.184(i)(9)(iii): Synthetic web sling(s) with snags, punctures, tears, or cuts were not immediately removed from service:    On or about July 14, 2016, in the sand blasting and staging areas where employees were exposed to crushed-by and struck-by hazards while using a synthetic web sling with snags, punctures, and tears.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using tight-fitting facepiece respirators were not fit tested prior to initial use of the respirator:  On or about July 14, 2016, and at times prior thereto, in the spray painting area where employees were required to wear tight fitting half face respirators without having been fit tested.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.178 Q07

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Jul 28, 2016
Abate by
Aug 16, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.178(q)(7): Industrial trucks were not examined before being placed in service:  On or about July 14, 2016, throughout the facility where employees were using forklifts that were put into service without first being examined to check unsafe conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341622678.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.