Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: S. G. ASSOCIATES OF MIAMI INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of S. G. ASSOCIATES OF MIAMI INC. in 3401 NW 71TH ST, MIAMI, FL 33147 (NAICS 337121). OSHA activity number 341622967.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch S. G. Associates of Miami INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for S. G. Associates of Miami INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3401 NW 71TH ST
City
MIAMI
State
FL
ZIP
33147
Mailing
3401 NW 71TH ST, MIAMI, FL 33147
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337121
Employees
25
Ownership type
Private (A)

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.95 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Nov 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $1,782 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8110

29 CFR 1910.95(b)(1): When employees were subjected to sound exceeding those listed in Table G-16, feasible administrative or engineering controls were not utilized:    On or about 8/2/16, at the above address jobsite, employees on the carpentry area were exposed to continuous noise at 67.32% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.1 dbA during the 431-minute sampling period on 08/02/16; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 49 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1781.5
  • · Z (S) $3563

1910.95 C01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Nov 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.9(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent:  On or about 8/2/16, at the above address jobsite, employees on the carpentry area were exposed to continuous noise at 67.32% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.1 dbA during the 431-minute sampling period on 08/02/16; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 49 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.95 D01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 8111

29 CFR 1910.95(d)(1): When information indicated that any employee's exposure equaled or exceed the 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 decibels, the employer did not develop and implement a monitoring program:  On or about 8/2/16, at the above address jobsite, employees on the carpentry area were exposed to continuous noise at 67.32% of the permissible daily noise exposure ( 8- hour time weighted average sound level of 90dbA) or an equivalent sound level of approximately 87.1 dbA during the 431-minute sampling period on 08/02/16; exposure calculations included a zero increment for the 49 minutes not sampled.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 B01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(1): The spraybooth was not substantially constructed of steel, securely and rigidly supported, or of concrete or masonry:  On or about 07/155/2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the spray booth was constructed of aluminum.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $3563

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $1,782
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained.    On or about 07/15/2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the spray booth did not have the required equipment to indicate air speed.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1781.5
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): The average air speed over the open face of the paint spray booth was less than 100 linear feet per minute.  On or about 07/15/2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the spray booth had an average air velocity of 52 feet per minute.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.107 B09

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(9): A clear space of not less than 3 feet on all sides was not kept free from storage or combustible construction:  On or about 07/15/2016, at the above addressed jobsite, a bench grinder was stored 2 feet from the rear of the spray booth.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Nov 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2470

29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): Employer had not developed or implemented a written hazard communication program included the requirements outlined in 29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1)(i) and (e)(1)(ii):   On or about 7/15/2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer had not develop and implemented a hazard communication program that included chemicals such as but not limited to isocyanates used at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Nov 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2470

29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): Employers did not have a safety data sheet in the workplace for each hazardous chemical which they use  On or about 7/15/2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not have the safety data sheets (SDS) for all chemicals such as but not limited to isocyanates used at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Nov 10, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 2470

29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  On or about 7/15/2016, at the above address jobsite, the employer did not provide training for all chemicals such as but not limited to isocyanates used at the workplace.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:   On or about 8/2/16, at the above address jobsite,  employees who wear a tight fitting respirator were not given the appendix D of the respirator standard.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

1910.134 C02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Dec 5, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(ii): The employer did not establish and implement those elements of a written program necessary to ensure that any employee using a respirator voluntarily was medically able to use that respirator, and that the respirator was cleaned, stored, and maintained so that its use does not present a health hazard to the user:  On or about 8/2/16, at the above address jobsite,  employees who wear a tight fitting respirator were not provided with a medical evaluation.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

View S. G. Associates of Miami INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341622967.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.