OSHA Inspection: NEXUS PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC

Issued

Feb 14, 2017

Abate by

Mar 31, 2017

Penalty

Initial $406 · Current $406

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: As of February 10, 2017, the employer had not certified to OSHA that the abatement was completed for the violations  from Inspection 1163058, citation 1 item 1a  and citation 1 item 1b, issued on 11-9-16, with a final order date of 11-21-16.

Issued

Nov 9, 2016

Abate by

Dec 13, 2016

Penalty

Initial $2,850 · Current $2,000 Reduced

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.132(d)(2): The employer did not verify that the required workplace hazard assessment has been performed through a written certification that identifies the workplace evaluated, the person certifying that the evaluation has been performed, the date(s) of the hazard assessment, and, which identifies the document as a certification of hazard assessment:    Jobsite: On or about July 15, 2016 and at times prior thereto, the ER did not properly complete a workplace hazard assessment to include the identification of the person certifying the evaluation has been performed, and the date(s) of the hazard assessment.

Issued

Nov 9, 2016

Abate by

Dec 13, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible.  Jobsite: On or about July 15, 2016 and at times prior thereto, the employer provided or authorized the use of filtering face piece respirators to be used voluntarily by employees without providing the information in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134.

Issued

Nov 9, 2016

Abate by

Nov 21, 2016

Penalty

Initial $2,850 · Current $0 Reduced

Hazardous substances 8870

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(g)(1)(iv)(A): Flexible cords and/or cables were used as a substitute for the fixed wiring of a structure:    Jobsite:  On or about July 15, 2016 and at times prior thereto employees were exposed to a electrical shock and/or fire hazards near the overhead garage door in the garage/storage area where a flexible cord was being used as a substitute for fixed wiring.

Issued

Nov 9, 2016

Abate by

Nov 21, 2016

Penalty

Initial $0 · Current $0

General-duty citation text

29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(ii): Flexible cords were not used only in continuous lengths without splice or tap:    Jobsite:  On or about July 15, 2016 and at times prior thereto a flexible extension cord in the garage/maintenance area was in use with a visible splice of wire nuts and electrical tape exposing employees to electrical shock and/or fire hazards.