Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: RICHARD WEAVER

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RICHARD WEAVER in 1014 COVE WAY, SOUTH CHARLESTON, WV 25309 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341638427.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Richard Weaver for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Richard Weaver is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RICHARD WEAVER
Site address
1014 COVE WAY
City
SOUTH CHARLESTON
State
WV
ZIP
25309
Mailing
108 TOP STREET, SOUTH POINT, OH 45680
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,200 · Current $1,200
29 CFR 1926.95(a): Personal protective equipment, including personal protective equipment for eyes, face, head, and extremities, protective clothing, respiratory devices, and protective shields and barriers, was not provided, used, or maintained in a sanitary and reliable condition it was necessary by reason of hazards of processes or environment, chemical hazards, radiological hazards, or mechanical irritants encountered in a manner capable of causing injury or impairment in the function of any part of the body through absorption, inhalation, or physical contact.  (a) South Charleston: On or about July 22, 2016 employees were carrying material including, but not limited to, bundles of shingles without the use of foot protection to prevent injury from physical contact.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1200

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:  (a) South Charleston: On or about July 22, 2016 employees were gathering materials located on the ground below roofing activities and were not protected from falling tools or materials.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,600 · Current $1,600
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.  (a) South Charleston, Roof: On or about July 22, 2016 an employee was using a Bostitch pneumatic nail gun to install shingles on a residential roof without the use of eye protection.  (b) South Charleston, Roof: On or about July 22, 2016 an employee was wearing sunglasses without protective lenses in accordance with the Z87.1-1968 requirements, while working in close proximity to nail gun operations.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $1600

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 11, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):  (a) South Charleston, Residential Roof: On or about July 22, 2016 and times prior, employees were removing old roofing materials and replacing with new on a 5:12 pitched roof that measured approximately 10 feet from the eave to the ground and did not have any fall protection systems in place.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $2400

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 1, 2016
Abate by
Aug 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  (a) South Charleston, Residential Roof: On or about July 22, 2016, employees were installing a new material to a 5:12 sloped roof that measured approximately 10 feet eave to ground and were not trained on the hazards of working from heights and the procedures to be followed.
Recent events (1)
  • · Z (S) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341638427.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.