Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CARMELO MARTINEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of CARMELO MARTINEZ in 334 SPINDLE COURT, CANONSBURG, PA 15317 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341679843.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Carmelo Martinez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Carmelo Martinez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CARMELO MARTINEZ
Site address
334 SPINDLE COURT
City
CANONSBURG
State
PA
ZIP
15317
Mailing
2152 LOWRIE STREET, PITTSBURGH, PA 15212
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.100 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Abate by
Aug 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,069 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets:     (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, employees were not wearing hard hats while they were walking below other employees who were working from tubular welded frame scaffolding and using hand tools.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1069
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.404 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Abate by
Aug 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,069 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(b)(1): The Employer did not use either ground fault circuit interrupters as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, or an assured equipment grounding conductor program as specified in paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of this section to protect employees on construction sites:    (a)  Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, employees were using hand held cord and plug tools and they were  not protected by either a GFCI nor did the employer have an assured equipment grounding conductor program.  The two onsite ground fault circuit interrupters were not working.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1069
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.404 F06

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Abate by
Aug 18, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,604 · Current $532 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:    (a)  Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, the grounding pin to an extension cord was missing.  This electrical extension cord was being used.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $532
  • — Z (S) $1604

1926.451 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,069 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(b)(1): Each platform on all working levels of scaffolds was not fully planked or decked between the front uprights and the guardrail supports as specified in paragraphs 1926.451(b)(1)(i)-(ii):     (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, an employee was working from a tubular welded frame scaffold and the working level was not fully planked.  The fall hazard was about 13 1/2 feet to the ground.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1069
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $1,069 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than 2 feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:     (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, employees were using the tubular welded frame scaffold uprights to access/egress the scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1069
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,673 · Current $1,624 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1): Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level were not protected from falling to that lower level:    (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, an employee was not protected from falling up to 16 feet while he was working from a tubular welded frame scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1624
  • — Z (S) $2673

1926.150 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Abate by
Aug 24, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.150(a)(1): The employer did not develop and maintain a fire protection program to be followed throughout all phases of construction and demolition work, and/or did not provide for the firefighting equipment as specified in this subpart:   (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, the employer did not develop and maintain a fire protection program not did the employer have any fire fighting equipment on the site.  The employees were using gasoline to fuel a cement mixer.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Abate by
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:   (a)  Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, the employer did not have a written hazardous communication program.  Employees are working with gasoline and Type S mortar.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Abate by
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1): The employer did not have a material safety data sheet for each hazardous chemical in use:   (a)  Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, the employer did not have material safety data sheets for the hazardous chemicals (gasoline and Type S mortar) that employees work with.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 12, 2016
Abate by
Sep 8, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 5, 2016, employees were not trained in the hazardous chemicals (i.e. gasoline and Type S mortar) that they were working with.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Carmelo Martinez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341679843.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.