Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ELVIS EUCEDA

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ELVIS EUCEDA in 28013 STATE HWY 181 BUILDING 3300, DAPHNE, AL 36526 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341684686.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Elvis Euceda — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Elvis Euceda is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
ELVIS EUCEDA
Site address
28013 STATE HWY 181 BUILDING 3300
City
DAPHNE
State
AL
ZIP
36526
Mailing
12649 GLEN OAK AVE, NEW PORT RICHEY, FL 34656
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
6
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.25 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,817 · Current $1,817
29 CFR 1926.25(a): During the course of construction, alteration, or repairs, debris was not kept cleared from work areas, passageways, and stairs, in and around buildings or other structures:  a) On or about August 3, 2016 at 28013 State Hwy 181, building 3300, Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure the work area around building 2900 was maintained free of debris and wood with protruding nails which exposed employees to the hazards associated with slips, trips, and falls.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $1817

1926.502 D16 III

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Oct 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level:  a) On or about August 3, 2016 and times prior at 28013 State Hwy 181, building 3300, Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure an employee taking measurements and  installing sheathing on the roof of a residential apartment building adjusted his rope grab as he moved allowing additional slack to accumulate allowing a fall of more than 6 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2138

1926.502 D06 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Oct 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(6)(i): A snaphook not of the locking type was engaged (i) directly to webbing, rope or wire rope; (ii) to each other (iii) to a Dee-ring to which another snaphook or other connector is attached;(iv) to a horizontal lifeline; or (v) to any objectwhich is incompatibly shaped or dimensioned in relation to the snaphook such that unintentional disengagement could occur by the connected object being able to depress the snaphook keeper and release itself.  a) On or about January 28, 2016 at 2101 Berry Hill Rd., Montgomery, Al., building 3300: The employer did not ensure employees using personal fall arrest were properly anchored in that their rope was wrapped around a support beam and the snap hook was connected back to the rope while taking measurements and installing sheathing which exposed them to falls of 30 feet.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.501 B13

Repeat Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Oct 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,276 · Current $4,276
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b):   a) On or about August 3, 2016 and times prior at 28013 State Hwy 181, building 3300, Daphne, Al: The employer failed to ensure employees involved in roof sheathing activities had fall protection in place exposing them to a fall hazard of 9.3 feet to the ground below.  Elvis Euceda was previously cited for a violation of this occupational safety and health standard or its equivalent standard for residential fall protection, which was contained in OSHA inspection number 1130873, citation number 01, item number 01 and was affirmed as a final order on April 18, 2016, with respect to a workplace located at Pelican Landing Apartments Bldg. 3 & 5, Mobile, Al.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (R) $4276

1926.503 B01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Oct 17, 2016
Abate by
Oct 25, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(b)(1): The employer did not verify fall protection training by preparing a written certification record:  a) On or about August 3, 2016 at 28013 State Hwy 181, building 3300, Daphne, Al: The employer failed to provide documentation of his employees showing fall protection training was conducted.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Elvis Euceda's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341684686.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.