Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FAURECIA

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of FAURECIA in 1207 ARVIN RD., DEXTER, MO 63846 (NAICS 336399). OSHA activity number 341689347.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Faurecia — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Faurecia is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
FAURECIA
Site address
1207 ARVIN RD.
City
DEXTER
State
MO
ZIP
63846
Mailing
P.O. BOX 339 ., DEXTER, MO 63846
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
A
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336399
Employees
540
Ownership type
A

12 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.1026 D04 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,543 · Current $3,180 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(4)(i): Within 15 working days after making an exposure determination in accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(2) or 29 CFR 1910.1026(d)(3), the employer either did not post the results in an appropriate location that was accessible to all affected employees, or did not notify each affected employee individually in writing of the results:  Employees with exposure to hexavalent chromium, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, and where representative air sampling was conducted, were not provided results of the sampling.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3180.1
  • — Z (S) $4543

1910.1026 L01 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)(ii): The employer did not address at least the following hazards with employees exposed to hexavalent chromium: Cancer, eye irritation, and skin sensitization:  Employees with exposure to hexavalent chromium, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, were not trained on the hazards of cancer, eye irritation, and sensitization.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 L01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(1)(iii): The employer had not ensured that each employee had access to chromium (VI) safety data sheets (sds), and was trained in accordance with the requirements of the Hazard Communication Standard and 29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2):   Employees with exposure to hexavalent chromium, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, did not have access to a hexavalent chromium sds or a chemical product sds that included hexavalent chromium health hazards.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 L02 I A

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(i)(A): The employer did not provide appropriate information and training for all employees exposed to chromium (VI), in that employees could not demonstrate knowledge of the contents of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026:  Employees with exposure to hexavalent chromium, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, were not trained on the content of the hexavalent standard.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1026 L02 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1026(l)(2)(ii): The employer did not make a copy of the Chromium (VI) standard, 29 CFR 1910.1026, readily available to all employees who were exposed to chromium (VI):  Employees with exposure to hexavalent chromium, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, were not aware of the ready availability of a copy of the hexavalent chromium standard.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1020 G01 I

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1)(i): Upon first entering into employment, and/or at least annually thereafter, the employer did not inform current employees of the existence, location, and availability of any records covered by 29 CFR 1910.1020:  Employees with exposure to hexavalent chromium, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, where personal air sampling was performed on welding fume, were not informed of the existence and availability of sampling records.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1020 G01 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1020(g)(1)(iii): Employees were not informed upon first entering into employment and/or at least annually thereafter of their right to access their medical and/or exposure records:  Employees with exposure to hexavalent chromium, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, where personal air sampling was performed on welding fume, were not informed of their right of access to sampling records.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,543 · Current $3,180 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  Employees with exposure to welding fume, as well as to other chemical hazards, that resulted in exposure to hexavalent chromium, nickel, and other chemicals, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, did not receive effective information and training as indicated by the lack of knowledge of chemical health hazards, location and availability of safety data sheets (sds), and that there was a new safety data sheet format, how to read the new safety data sheet, and new label and sds pictograms.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3180.1
  • — Z (S) $4543

1910.1200 H02 III

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(2)(iii): The employer did not provide information to the employees as to the location and availability of the safety data sheets required by 29 CFR 1910.1200:  Employees with exposure to welding fume, as well as to other chemical hazards, that resulted in exposure to hexavalent chromium, nickel, and other chemicals, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, did not receive effective information and training on the location and availability of safety data sheets (sds).  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 H03 II

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area:  Employees with exposure to welding fume, as well as to other chemical hazards, that resulted in exposure to hexavalent chromium, nickel, and other chemicals, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, did not receive effective information and training on the physical and health hazards of the chemicals potentially exposed to.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.1200 J01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(j)(1): The employer did not train employees regarding the new label elements and safety data sheets format:  Employees with exposure to welding fume, as well as to other chemical hazards, that resulted in exposure to hexavalent chromium, nickel, and other chemicals, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, did not receive effective information and training as indicated by the lack of knowledge that there was a new safety data sheet (sds) format, how to read the new safety data sheet, and new label and sds pictograms.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 22 exposed
Issued
Sep 27, 2016
Abate by
Nov 15, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  Employees with exposure to welding fume, as well as to other chemical hazards, that resulted in exposure to hexavalent chromium, nickel, and other chemicals, such as, but not limited to, during welding at lines 4308 and 5500, did not receive Appendix D or similar information on the use of single use, disposable respirators.  Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Faurecia's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341689347.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.