FREEBURG, IL —
OSHA Inspection: FRUTH CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of FRUTH CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED in JOBSITE NEXT TO 8216 PEABODY ROAD, FREEBURG, IL 62243 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341693299.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- FRUTH CONSTRUCTION, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- JOBSITE NEXT TO 8216 PEABODY ROAD
- City
- FREEBURG
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62243
- Mailing
- 215 EAST MARKET, RED BUD, IL 62278
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- A
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238130
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.100 A
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,283 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.100(a): Employees working in areas where there was a possible danger of head injury from impact, or falling or flying objects, or from electrical shock and burns, were not protected by protective helmets: Head protective equipment was not used when workers were exposed to struck-by hazards when workers on the ground were working below unsecured material.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1282.8
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 5, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,283 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1282.8
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 29, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,245 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling up to approximately eighteen (18) feet off the roof when they were installing roofing sheeting.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2244.6
- — Z (S) $3741
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238130)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341693299.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.