NOKOMIS, IL —
OSHA Inspection: STEPHEN PEARSE DBA PEARSE CONSTRUCTION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of STEPHEN PEARSE DBA PEARSE CONSTRUCTION in 409 SOUTH SPRUCE ST., NOKOMIS, IL 62075 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341695377.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- STEPHEN PEARSE DBA PEARSE CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 409 SOUTH SPRUCE ST.
- City
- NOKOMIS
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62075
- Mailing
- 412 SOUTH SPRUCE, NOKOMIS, IL 62075
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: The employer did not ensure that eye protective equipment was used when employees were exposed to eye injury while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $2138
- — I (S) $1282.8
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.416 A01
- Issued
- Sep 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(1): Employees were permitted to work in proximity to electric power circuits and were not protected against electric shock by de-energizing and grounding the circuits or effectively guarding the circuits by insulation or other means: The employer did not ensure that circuits were de-energized or insulated when employees working to remove asphalt roofing shingles and install felt paper in close proximity to a 120/208v triplex service drop.
Recent events (3)
- — A (O) $3741
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.416 A03
- Issued
- Sep 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.416(a)(3): Before work began, the employer did not ascertain by inquiry, direct observation, or by instruments, whether any part of an energized electric power circuit, exposed or concealed, was so located that the performance of the work could bring any person, tool, or machine into physical or electrical contact with the electric power circuit. The employer did not ensure that the electrical lines from the service drop were located so that employees working to install asphalt shingles would not come in contact with electrical power circuit from a 120/208v triplex service drop.
Recent events (3)
- — A (O) $0
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels was not protected by guardrail systems, safety net systems, personal fall arrest systems, or an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b), nor did the employer demonstrate that it is infeasible or creates a greater hazard to use these systems and develop and implement a fall protection plan which meets the requirements of paragraph (k) of section 1926.502: The employer did not ensure fall protection was implemented during residential construction operations when workers were exposed to the hazard of falling approximately twelve (12) feet off the roof eve when they were installing roof shingles.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3741
- — I (S) $2244.6
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 22, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 28, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Portable ladders are used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder side rails do not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface to which the ladder is used to gain access: The employer did not ensure portable ladders were constructed and placed so three (3) feet or more was extended above the upper landing. Workers performing residential construction were exposed to falling approximately twelve (12) feet while using an extension ladder to ascend/descend from the roof to the ground.
Recent events (3)
- — A (S) $3741
- — I (S) $2244.6
- — Z (S) $3741
More inspections at Stephen Pearse DBA Pearse Construction
View Stephen Pearse DBA Pearse Construction's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341695377.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.