Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RICARDO MENDEZ

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RICARDO MENDEZ in 3109 AND 3113 BUTLER, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62703 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341703213.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Ricardo Mendez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Ricardo Mendez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
RICARDO MENDEZ
Site address
3109 AND 3113 BUTLER
City
SPRINGFIELD
State
IL
ZIP
62703
Mailing
1524 2ND AVE N, BESSEMER, AL 35020
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238160
Employees
15
Ownership type
A

10 citations on file for this inspection.

1903.19 C01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated:  On August 31, 2016, Ricardo Mendez, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated.  Abatement certification was not received for the following violations:              a.  Citation 1 Item 1a & b and,         b.  Citation 1 Item 2.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1903.19 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Nov 16, 2016
Abate by
Dec 27, 2016
Penalty
Initial $400 · Current $400
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required:   On July 27, 2016, Francisco Flores dba Good Reliable Roofing was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated.  Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations:            a.  Citation 1 Item 3a - c and,         b.  Citation 1 Item 4a & b.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $400

1926.20 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,563 · Current $3,563
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part:    On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to struck by hazards, eye injuries and fall hazards while performing roofing work and the employer did not develop and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $3563

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person:    On or about July 22, 2016, employees were exposed to struck by hazards, eye injuries and fall hazards while performing roofing work and a competent person did not conduct an inspection of the job site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,850 · Current $2,850
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury:                                                                      On or about August 16, 2016, employees were operating pneumatic nail guns to install shingles on a roof and the employer did not ensure the employees wore safety glasses while operating the nail guns.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $2850

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,988 · Current $4,988
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure:    On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 25 feet while performing roofing activities and a suitable fall protection system was not used.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4988

1926.502 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(1): A fall protection plan was not prepared by a qualified person and developed specifically for the site where the residential construction work was being performed and conform to the provisions specified in 1926.502(k)(1) through (k)(10):  On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 25 feet while performing roofing activities and a suitable fall protection plan was not developed and documented.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.503 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards:  On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 25 feet while performing roofing activities and each employee was not trained on the procedures to be followed to minimize the fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.1053 B01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $4,988 · Current $4,988
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladder was used for access to an upper level landing surface, the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder.    a. On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 25 feet when using a portable ladder to access the roof of 3113 Butler and the ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.   b. On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 20 feet when using a portable ladder to access a deck of 3109 Butler and the ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $4988

1926.1060 A01

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 30, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards.  On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 20 feet when using portable ladders to access the roofs and the employees were not provide a training program to enable each employee to recognize the hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be follow to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (S) $0

View Ricardo Mendez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341703213.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.