SPRINGFIELD, IL —
OSHA Inspection: RICARDO MENDEZ
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of RICARDO MENDEZ in 3109 AND 3113 BUTLER, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62703 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341703213.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RICARDO MENDEZ
- Site address
- 3109 AND 3113 BUTLER
- City
- SPRINGFIELD
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62703
- Mailing
- 1524 2ND AVE N, BESSEMER, AL 35020
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
1903.19 C01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(c)(1): The employer did not certify to OSHA, within 10 calendar days after the abatement date, that the cited violation had been abated: On August 31, 2016, Ricardo Mendez, was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through written certification that each citation was abated. Abatement certification was not received for the following violations: a. Citation 1 Item 1a & b and, b. Citation 1 Item 2.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1903.19 D01
- Issued
- Nov 16, 2016
- Abate by
- Dec 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $400 · Current $400
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1903.19(d)(1): The employer did not submit to the Agency documents demonstrating that abatement is complete for each willful or repeat violation and for any serious violation for which the Agency indicates in the citation that such abatement documentation is required: On July 27, 2016, Francisco Flores dba Good Reliable Roofing was issued citations and the employer did not verify, through documents that each citation was abated. Abatement documentation was not received for the following violations: a. Citation 1 Item 3a - c and, b. Citation 1 Item 4a & b.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $400
1926.20 B01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,563 · Current $3,563
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(1): The employer did not initiate and maintain accident prevention programs as necessary to comply with this part: On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to struck by hazards, eye injuries and fall hazards while performing roofing work and the employer did not develop and maintain an accident prevention program.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3563
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2): The employer did not initiate and maintain a safety program which provides for frequent and regular inspections of jobsites, materials, and equipment to be made by a competent person: On or about July 22, 2016, employees were exposed to struck by hazards, eye injuries and fall hazards while performing roofing work and a competent person did not conduct an inspection of the job site to identify and eliminate the hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,850 · Current $2,850
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment was not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury: On or about August 16, 2016, employees were operating pneumatic nail guns to install shingles on a roof and the employer did not ensure the employees wore safety glasses while operating the nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2850
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,988 · Current $4,988
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were other provisions of paragraph (b) of this section used to provide an alternative fall protection measure: On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 25 feet while performing roofing activities and a suitable fall protection system was not used.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4988
1926.502 K01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(k)(1): A fall protection plan was not prepared by a qualified person and developed specifically for the site where the residential construction work was being performed and conform to the provisions specified in 1926.502(k)(1) through (k)(10): On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 25 feet while performing roofing activities and a suitable fall protection plan was not developed and documented.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 25 feet while performing roofing activities and each employee was not trained on the procedures to be followed to minimize the fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $4,988 · Current $4,988
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where a portable ladder was used for access to an upper level landing surface, the ladder's length did not allow the ladder side rails to extend at least 3 feet (0.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed and/or a grasping device was not provided to assist employees in mounting and dismounting the ladder. a. On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 25 feet when using a portable ladder to access the roof of 3113 Butler and the ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed. b. On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 20 feet when using a portable ladder to access a deck of 3109 Butler and the ladder did not extend at least 3 feet above the upper landing surface being accessed.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $4988
1926.1060 A01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1060(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee using ladders as necessary, enabling each employee to recognize hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be followed to minimize these hazards. On or about August 16, 2016, employees were exposed to fall hazards of greater than 20 feet when using portable ladders to access the roofs and the employees were not provide a training program to enable each employee to recognize the hazards related to ladders and the procedures to be follow to minimize the hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $0
More inspections at Ricardo Mendez
View Ricardo Mendez's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341703213.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.