CHESTERFIELD, MO —
OSHA Inspection: VETERINARY GROUP OF CHESTERFIELD
Complaint inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VETERINARY GROUP OF CHESTERFIELD in 17709 EDDISON AVE., CHESTERFIELD, MO 63005 (NAICS 541940). OSHA activity number 341705440.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- VETERINARY GROUP OF CHESTERFIELD
- Site address
- 17709 EDDISON AVE.
- City
- CHESTERFIELD
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63005
- Mailing
- 17709 EDISON AVE., CHESTERFIELD, MO 63005
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 541940
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,619 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.304(g)(5): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, and enclosures was not permanent, continuous, and effective: a. A 110 V fan in the boarding area was used with a missing ground pin (equipment grounding conductor). b. Two 110 V blowers in the grooming area were used with missing ground pins. c. A 110 V lift table in the grooming area was used with a missing ground pin. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2618.7
- — Z (S) $3741
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.303(b)(2): Listed or labeled electrical equipment was not used or installed in accordance with instructions included in the listing or labeling: a. In the boarding area, a refrigerator and washing machine were energized by a power strip. (A relocatable power tap (power strip) is not approved to power appliances, and stationary electrical equipment must be plugged into a permanent wiring system (also see 1910.305(g)(iv)(A).) Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.305(g)(2)(iii): Flexible cords were not connected to devices and fittings so that tension would not be transmitted to joints or terminal screws: a. In the grooming area, the strain relief insulation to the fan plug was damaged. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 F06
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,619 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(f)(6): Except as provided in paragraphs (f)(7) and (f)(8) of this section, the employer did not ensure that each container of hazardous chemicals in the workplace was labeled, tagged or marked with either the information specified under paragraphs (f)(1)(i) through (v) of this section for labels on shipped containers or with the product identifier and pictures, symbols or combination thereof which provide at least general information regarding the hazards of the chemicals, and which, in conjunction with the other information immediately available to employees under the hazard communication program, will provide employees with the specific information regarding the physical and health hazards of the hazardous chemical: Throughout the facility, there were unlabeled containers of chemical products used, such as in the clinic area an approximate 28 oz bottle was unlabeled, in the boarding area, an approximate 28 oz. bottle was labeled only as "Boarding," and similar conditions were found in other areas. Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2618.7
- — Z (S) $3741
1910.1200 H03 II
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(ii): Employee training did not include the physical and health hazards of the chemicals in the work area: Employees were not trained on the physical and health hazards of the actual chemical products used such as the specific hazards stated on safety data sheets (safety data sheets of the products or group of products were not included in training and not all employees were aware of safety data sheets and their availability). Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.1200 H03 IV
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(iv): The details of the hazard communication program developed by the employer, did not include an explanation on how employees could obtain and use the appropriate hazard information: Employees were not trained on how to access safety data sheets electronically (or ensuring that all safety data sheets were contained as a hard copy with an index of all chemical products for employee access). Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.157 G01
- Issued
- Aug 26, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.157(g)(1): An educational program was not provided for all employees to familiarize them with the general principles of fire extinguisher use and the hazards involved with incipient stage fire fighting: a. Where portable fire extinguishers were present in the facility, employees were not told whether they were to use or not use the equipment for incipient stage fires. (Note: although some employees knew of evacuation and a meeting place upon exiting in the case of a fire, not all were trained. Instead of training employees on how to use an extinguisher, an employer may have an evacuation plan, including where to meet upon exit and a means to ensure all employees are accounted for. An employer may also make extinguishers available for some employees but annual training would then be required.) Abatement documentation is required for this violation.
Recent events (2)
- — I (O) $0
- — Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 541940)
More inspections in MO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341705440.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.