Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: RUFINO RUIZ-SANTIBANEZ

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RUFINO RUIZ-SANTIBANEZ in 19923 SHOAL HAVEN CT., SPRING, TX 77379 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 341714277.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Rufino Ruiz-Santibanez — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Rufino Ruiz-Santibanez is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
19923 SHOAL HAVEN CT.
City
SPRING
State
TX
ZIP
77379
Mailing
17310 KEITH HARROW BLVD, HOUSTON, TX 77084
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $1,603 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.       On or about August 22, 2016 at the work site where employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while operating air powered nail guns without wearing eye protection.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1603.2
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.501 B13

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $1,603 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b):       On or about August 22, 2016 at the worksite where employees were exposed to fall hazards of more than 6 feet while framing on the north side of a home without a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1603.2
  • — Z (S) $2672

1926.404 F06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.404(f)(6): The path to ground from circuits, equipment, or enclosures was not permanent and continuous:     On or about August 22, 2016, at the work site where employees were exposed to electrical hazards while using an electrical extension cord where the ground wire had detached from the plug.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Rufino Ruiz-Santibanez's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341714277.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.