EAST PROVIDENCE, RI —
OSHA Inspection: JACINTO IVAN PANIMBOZA
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of JACINTO IVAN PANIMBOZA in 92 LENA STREET, EAST PROVIDENCE, RI 02914 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341717221.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JACINTO IVAN PANIMBOZA
- Site address
- 92 LENA STREET
- City
- EAST PROVIDENCE
- State
- RI
- ZIP
- 02914
- Mailing
- 45 FAIRFIELD AVENUE, NORWALK, CT 06854
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: (a) Worksite: On or about 8/23/2016, eye and face protective equipment was not used when employees were using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employees provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501(b): (a) Worksite: On or about 8/23/2016, employees were not protected from falling while working on a roof approximately seventeen feet above a lower level.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.503 A01
- Issued
- Aug 30, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(a)(1): The employer did not provide a training program for each employee potentially exposed to fall hazards to enable each employee to recognize the hazards of falling and the procedures to be followed in order to minimize these hazards: (a) Worksite: On or about 8/23/2016, the employer did not provide adequate training for the employees who might be exposed to fall hazards.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (O) $300
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in RI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341717221.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.