Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: VISION SYSTEMS, INC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of VISION SYSTEMS, INC in 769 WESLEY AVE, TARPON SPRINGS, FL 34689 (NAICS 333314). OSHA activity number 341723633.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Vision Systems, INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Vision Systems, INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
VISION SYSTEMS, INC
Site address
769 WESLEY AVE
City
TARPON SPRINGS
State
FL
ZIP
34689
Mailing
769 WESLEY AVE, TARPON SPRINGS, FL 34689
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333314
Employees
34
Ownership type
A

14 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $3,802 · Current $2,281 Reduced
OSH ACT of 1970 Section (5)(a)(1): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards:  a. Shop west area - 1 inch white PVC piping schedule 40 and glued in fittings were used in exposed above ground areas during manufacturing operations to transport compressed air from a Quincy air compressor during manufacturing operations.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2281.2
  • — Z (S) $3802

1910.107 B01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(1): The spray booth was not substantially constructed of steel, securely and rigidly supported, or of concrete or masonry:  a. Spray booth - where flammable materials were used during spraying, the spray booth was constructed with combustible material.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.107 B05 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(b)(5)(i): There were no visible gauges, audible alarms or pressure activated devices installed in paint spray booths to indicate or ensure that the required air speed was maintained:  a. Spray booth - visible gauges or audible alarms were not installed.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 G07

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(g)(7): "No smoking" signs in large letters on contrasting color background were not conspicuously posted at all spraying areas and paint storage rooms:  a. Spray booth - the area did not have "no smoking" signs posted.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 H12

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.107(h)(12): All areas used for spraying, including the interior of the booth, were not protected by automatic sprinklers where this protection is available.  Where this protection is not available, other approved automatic extinguishing equipment shall be provided:  a. Spray booth - sprinklers or automated extinguishing equipment were not used.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.107 C06

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.107(c)(6):  Electrical wiring and equipment did not conform to the provisions of this paragraph and was not otherwise be in accordance with subpart S of this part:  a. Spray booth - fixed light panels and electrical outlets used inside of a class 1 division 1 spray booth created ignition hazards.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.178 L01 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Feb 16, 2017
Penalty
Initial $5,070 · Current $3,042 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator is competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l):  a. Shop - for the Clark ESMII-15S forklift, the employer did not provide operator training.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3042
  • — Z (S) $5070

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  a. Spray booth - the employer did not provide a written respiratory protection program when employees were required to use 3M half face respirators.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  a. Spray booth - the employer did not provide medical evaluations when half face respirators were required.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):  a. Spray booth - the employer did not provide fit testing for required half face respirator use.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.305 A02 X

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.305(a)(2)(x): Flexible cords and cables were not protected from accidental damage, as might be caused, for example, by sharp corners, projections, and doorways or other pinch points:  a. Spray booth - flexible cord ran through the side door.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a. Shop - the employer did not provide a written hazard communication program for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to paint, primer, reducer and accelerator.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G08

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(8): The employer did not ensure that safety data sheets were readily accessible to the employees in their work area during each work shift:  a. Shop - the employer did not provide safety data sheets for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to paint, primer, reducer and accelerator.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Feb 10, 2017
Abate by
Mar 30, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area:  a. Shop - the employer did not provide hazard communication training for employees exposed to chemical products such as, but not limited to paint, primer, reducer and accelerator.  Violation observed on or about 8/18/16.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Vision Systems, INC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341723633.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.