GREENSBURG, PA ·
OSHA Inspection: MARK FUNK
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARK FUNK in 141 SOUTH MAIN STREET, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341726651.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MARK FUNK
- Site address
- 141 SOUTH MAIN STREET
- City
- GREENSBURG
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 15601
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 703, MOUNT PLEASANT, PA 15666
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (B)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238140
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.451 G01 II
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,200 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system: (a) Jobsite: On or about August 25, 2016, an employee was working from a two-point suspension scaffold and he was not tied off. The fall hazard to the employee was approximately 50 feet to the concrete sidewalk.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $2200
- · Z (S) $3741
1926.503 C03
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): When inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill, the employer shall retrain the affected employee: (a) Jobsite: On or about August 25, 2016, an employee who was not wearing any personal fall protection while working from a two point suspension scaffold needs to retrained so that he will always use personal fall protection when working from a two point suspension scaffold.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $0
- · Z (S) $0
1926.451 G03 I
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,817 · Current $1,060 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(i): Vertical lifelines were not fastened to a fixed safe point of anchorage, independent of the scaffold, and protected from sharp edges and abrasion: (a) Jobsite: On or about August 25, 2016, all four lifelines were not protected from abrasion or sharp edges as they passed over the metal covered parapet wall.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1060
- · Z (S) $1817
1926.451 G03 IV
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 7, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,272 · Current $1,340 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(iv): (iv) Vertical lifelines, independent support lines, and suspension ropes shall not be attached to each other, nor shall they be attached to or use the same point of anchorage, nor shall they be attached to the same point on the scaffold or personal fall arrest system: (a) Jobsite: On or about August 25, 2016, two employees were working from a two point suspension scaffold and one vertical lifeline was attached to a second vertical lifeline. The fall hazard was about 35 feet to the concrete sidewalk.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1340
- · Z (S) $2272
1926.451 F01
- Issued
- Aug 31, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 13, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(1): Scaffold and/or scaffold components were loaded in excess of their maximum intended loads or rated capacities, whichever was less: (a) Jobsite: On or about August 25, 2016, the four "homemade" C hooks for the one two point suspension scaffold were in use and they had not been rated by a registered professional engineer as to what their rated capacity was.
Recent events (2)
- · I (O) $0
- · Z (O) $0
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238140)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341726651.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.