Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,892Inspections Most recent open 2026-09-03 Last loaded 2026-09-07

OSHA Inspection: MARK FUNK

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of MARK FUNK in 141 SOUTH MAIN STREET, GREENSBURG, PA 15601 (NAICS 238140). OSHA activity number 341726651.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Mark Funk for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Mark Funk is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
MARK FUNK
Site address
141 SOUTH MAIN STREET
City
GREENSBURG
State
PA
ZIP
15601
Mailing
P. O. BOX 703, MOUNT PLEASANT, PA 15666
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (B)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238140
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.451 G01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $2,200 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(ii): Each employee on a single-point or two-point adjustable suspension scaffold was not protected by both a personal fall arrest system and a guardrail system:    (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 25, 2016, an employee was working from a two-point suspension scaffold and he was not tied off.  The fall hazard to the employee was approximately 50 feet to the concrete sidewalk.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $2200
  • · Z (S) $3741

1926.503 C03

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): 29 CFR 1926.503(c)(3): When inadequacies in an affected employee's knowledge or use of fall protection systems or equipment indicate that the employee has not retained the requisite understanding or skill, the employer shall retrain the affected employee:   (a)  Jobsite:  On or about August 25, 2016, an employee who was not wearing any personal fall protection while working from a two point suspension scaffold needs to retrained so that he will always use personal fall protection when working from a two point suspension scaffold.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $0
  • · Z (S) $0

1926.451 G03 I

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,817 · Current $1,060 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(i): Vertical lifelines were not fastened to a fixed safe point of anchorage, independent of the scaffold, and protected from sharp edges and abrasion:     (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 25, 2016, all four lifelines were not protected from abrasion or sharp edges as they passed over the metal covered parapet wall.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1060
  • · Z (S) $1817

1926.451 G03 IV

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 7, 2016
Penalty
Initial $2,272 · Current $1,340 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(3)(iv): (iv) Vertical lifelines, independent support lines, and suspension ropes shall not be attached to each other, nor shall they be attached to or use the same point of anchorage, nor shall they be attached to the same point on the scaffold or personal fall arrest system:    (a) Jobsite:  On or about August 25, 2016, two employees were working from a two point suspension scaffold and one vertical lifeline was attached to a second vertical lifeline.   The fall hazard was about 35 feet to the concrete sidewalk.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1340
  • · Z (S) $2272

1926.451 F01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Aug 31, 2016
Abate by
Sep 13, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(1): Scaffold and/or scaffold components were loaded in excess of their maximum intended loads or rated capacities, whichever was less:   (a)  Jobsite:  On or about August 25, 2016, the four "homemade" C hooks for the one two point suspension scaffold were in use and they had not been rated by a registered professional engineer as to what their rated capacity was.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O) $0
  • · Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341726651.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.