COLORADO SPRINGS, CO —
OSHA Inspection: RAMON BUENDIAS
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of RAMON BUENDIAS in 5410 GALLEY ROAD, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80915 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341727808.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RAMON BUENDIAS
- Site address
- 5410 GALLEY ROAD
- City
- COLORADO SPRINGS
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80915
- Mailing
- 350 GAHART DR. APT. #3, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO 80916
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: a) On or about January 29, 2016 and at times prior, an employee was exposed to eye hazards from flying particles while using nail guns to install roofing materials. The employees were not protected with eye protection.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $2672
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): a) On or about Jun 3, 2016 and at times prior, employees were exposed to approximately 10 to 15 feet fall hazards while working on the roof of a split-level residential house. The employees were not provided with a fall protection system while working on the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 12, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 16, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: a) On or about January 29, 2016 and at times prior, employees were exposed to 15 feet fall hazards while accessing the roof of a residential house. The side rails of the ladder were not extended at least 3 feet above the landing surface of the roof.
Recent events (1)
- — Z (S) $3741
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341727808.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.