Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CRC EVANS PIPELINE

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CRC EVANS PIPELINE in 10700 E. INDEPENDANCE ST., TULSA, OK 74116 (NAICS 333132). OSHA activity number 341728236.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CRC Evans Pipeline — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CRC Evans Pipeline is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CRC EVANS PIPELINE
Site address
10700 E. INDEPENDANCE ST.
City
TULSA
State
OK
ZIP
74116
Mailing
10700 E. INDEPENDANCE ST., TULSA, OK 74116
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
333132
Employees
140
Ownership type
A

5 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2017
Abate by
Feb 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,519 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use:  On or about August 15, 2016 and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure a written respiratory protection program was established and implemented for employees directed to wear respirators, exposing employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6519

1910.134 E01

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2017
Abate by
Feb 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:  On or about August 15, 2016 and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure employees using respirators in required locations had received a medical evaluation, exposing the employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 H01 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2017
Abate by
Feb 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(h)(1)(ii): Respirators issued to more than one employee were not cleaned and disinfected before being worn by different individuals:  On or about August 15, 2016 and at times prior to, the employer did not ensure respirators used by more than one employee were cleaned and disinfected, exposing employees to unsanitary conditions and health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.134 K

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2017
Abate by
Feb 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(k): The employer did not provided effective training to employees who are required to use respirators:  On or about August 15, 2016 and at times prior to, the employer did not provide training to employees who were required to wear respirators in areas where chemicals were present, exposing the employees to health hazards.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1910.141 E

Deleted Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Feb 3, 2017
Abate by
Feb 21, 2017
Penalty
Initial $6,519 · Current $0 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.141(e): Where employees were required by a particular standard to wear protective clothing, because of the possibility of contamination with toxic materials, the employer did not provide change rooms equipped with storage facilities for street cloths.  On or about August 15, 2016 and at times prior, the employer did not ensure change rooms equipped with storage facilities were provided for employees wearing contaminiated personal protective clothing, exposing employees to unsanitary conditions.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $6519

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341728236.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.