O FALLON, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: DAN MUELLER DBA WHITE OAK CONSTRUCTION
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of DAN MUELLER DBA WHITE OAK CONSTRUCTION in 1402 FRONTAGE ROAD, O FALLON, IL 62269 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341730844.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DAN MUELLER DBA WHITE OAK CONSTRUCTION
- Site address
- 1402 FRONTAGE ROAD
- City
- O FALLON
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 62269
- Mailing
- 7900 JEFFERSON ROAD, FREEBURG, IL 62243
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (A)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $2,138
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents: Eye protective equipment was not used when employees were exposed to struck-by hazards while using pneumatic nail guns.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $2138
- · I (S) $1069
- · Z (S) $2138
1926.502 D16 III
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $3,741
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(16)(iii): Personal fall arrest systems, when stopping a fall, were not rigged such that an employee could not free fall more than 6 feet (1.8 m) nor contact any lower level: The employer did not ensure that fall protection systems were used in a manner to keep employees from free falling more than 6 foot while performing roofing activities.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $3741
- · I (S) $1871
- · Z (S) $3741
1926.502 D17
- Issued
- Sep 6, 2016
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,672 · Current $2,672
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.502(d)(17): The attachment point of the body harness was not located in the center of the wearer's back near shoulder level, or above the wearer's head: The employer did not ensure employees were wearing fall protection harnesses correctly as to ensure that the connection point of the snaphook was near shoulder level.
Recent events (3)
- · A (S) $2672
- · I (S) $1336
- · Z (S) $2672
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 341730844.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.