Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: SERVICE KING PAINT & BODY, LLC

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of SERVICE KING PAINT & BODY, LLC in 2317 PAT BOOKER RD., UNIVERSAL CITY, TX 78148 (NAICS 811121). OSHA activity number 341737195.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Service King Paint & Body, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Service King Paint & Body, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
2317 PAT BOOKER RD.
City
UNIVERSAL CITY
State
TX
ZIP
78148
Mailing
2317 PAT BOOKER RD., UNIVERSAL CITY, TX 78148
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
811121
Employees
7000
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.106 E06 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,126 · Current $2,850 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.106(e)(6)(ii): Category 1 or 2 flammable liquids, or Category 3 flammable liquids with a flashpoint below 100 °F (37.8 °C), were dispensed into containers without the nozzle and container being electrically interconnected:    Paint Department: On or about August 30, 2016, employee(s) were exposed to fire hazards from the transfer of Safety-Kleen Ultra-Kleen Spray Equipment Solution (Toluene 15-65%, Acetone 10-55%) to and from chemical drums that were not bonded or grounded.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $2850
  • — Z (S) $7126

1910.132 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $10,689 · Current $3,207 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.132(a): Protective equipment was not used when necessary whenever hazards capable of causing injury and impairment were encountered:    Painting Department: On or about August 30, 2016, and times thereafter, employee(s) who perform spray paint processes were exposed to chemical hazards from the use of paints, activators, hardeners and additives containing chemicals such as, but not limited to 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate and Isophorone diisocyanate, which are skin sensitizers, as well as various organic chemicals and solvents, including Methyl Ethyl Ketone, without chemically resistant personal protective equipment, including chemically resistant work boots or boot covers.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $3207
  • — Z (S) $10689

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $7,126 · Current $3,563 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.138(a): The employer did not select and require employee(s) to use appropriate hand protection when employees' hands were exposed to hazards such as those from skin absorption of harmful substances; severe cuts or lacerations; severe abrasion; punctures; chemical burns; thermal burns; and harmful temperature extremes:    Paint Department: On or about August 30, 2016, and times thereafter, employee(s) who perform paint prep work processes were exposed to chemical hazards from the use of Norton Saint-Gobain Black Powder Guide Coat(Iron oxide, carbon) which contains skin irritants and eye irritants without chemically resistant personal protective equipment, including chemically resistant gloves.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3563
  • — Z (S) $7126

1910.134 G01 I A

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 21, 2016
Abate by
Jan 6, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(g)(1)(i)(A): Respirators with tight-fitting facepieces were worn by employees who had facial hair that came between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face or that interfered with valve function:  a) Paint department: On or about August 30, 2016, and times thereafter, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) who were required to wear 3M half mask tight fitting respirators while performing painting and sanding operations were free of facial hair between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.   b) Body Shop: On or about September 7, 2016, the employer did not ensure that employee(s) who were required to wear 3M half mask tight fitting respirators while performing sanding operations were free of facial hair between the sealing surface of the facepiece and the face.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

View Service King Paint & Body, LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341737195.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.