Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FLACKS PAINTING & WATERPROOFING INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of FLACKS PAINTING & WATERPROOFING INC. in 1461 S. OCEAN BLVD, LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA, FL 33308 (NAICS 238320). OSHA activity number 341741908.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Flacks Painting & Waterproofing INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Flacks Painting & Waterproofing INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1461 S. OCEAN BLVD
City
LAUDERDALE BY THE SEA
State
FL
ZIP
33308
Mailing
1000 NE 26TH AVE, POMPANO BEACH, FL 33062
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238320
Employees
11
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 C01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2016
Abate by
Nov 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0

Hazardous substances 9010

29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1): A written respiratory protection program that included the provisions in 29 CFR 1910.134(c)(1)(i) - (ix) with worksite specific procedures was not established and implemented for required respirator use: (Construction Reference 1926.103)(a):   On or about August 31, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop and implement a written respiratory protection program for employees who were provided with and were required to wear a 3M N95 filtering face-pieces and a 3M elastomeric half-mask respirator while performing demolition work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2016
Abate by
Nov 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: (Construction Reference 1926.103):  On or about August 31, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees who were provided with and were required to wear a 3M N95 filtering face-pieces and a 3M elastomeric half-mask respirator while performing demolition work, were not provided with medical evaluations.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.134 F02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2016
Abate by
Nov 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(2): Employee(s) using a tight-fitting facepiece respirator were not annually fit tested: (Construction Reference 1926.103):  On or about August 31, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not provide respirator fit testing for employees who were provided with and were required to wear a 3M N95 filtering face-pieces and 3M elastomeric half-mask respirator while performing demolition work.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2016
Abate by
Nov 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met: (Construction Reference: 1926.59)  On or about August 31, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not develop and implement a written hazard communication program for employees who worked with products that contain hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to silica and epoxy resins.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 G01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2016
Abate by
Nov 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(g)(1):  At this job site, the employer did not have a safety data sheet for the chemicals being used:  (Construction Reference 1926.103):  On or about August 31, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, the employer did not maintain safety data sheets for products that contain hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to silica and epoxy resins.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 1, 2016
Abate by
Nov 29, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(1): Employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals in their work area at the time of their initial assignment and whenever a new hazard that the employees had not been previously trained about was introduced into their work area: (Construction Reference: 1926.59):  On or about August 31, 2016, at the above addressed jobsite, employees were not provided effective information and training on hazardous chemicals such as but not limited to silica and epoxy resins.
Recent events (1)
  • — Z (O) $0

View Flacks Painting & Waterproofing INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341741908.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.