Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ACUTE TUCKPOINTING & CONSTRUCTION

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ACUTE TUCKPOINTING & CONSTRUCTION in 3892 WYOMING AVENUE, SAINT LOUIS, MO 63116 (NAICS 238190). OSHA activity number 341744621.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Acute Tuckpointing & Construction — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Acute Tuckpointing & Construction is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3892 WYOMING AVENUE
City
SAINT LOUIS
State
MO
ZIP
63116
Mailing
42 MAY VALLEY LANE, FENTON, MO 63026
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238190
Employees
1
Ownership type
A

6 citations on file for this inspection.

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 5 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Abate by
Sep 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,207 · Current $1,604 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Employees were not provided with eye and face protection equipment when machines or operations present potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents:    a/  At the job site, employee(s) were not provided with appropriate safety glasses while using hand-held grinders to remove mortar from in-between courses of brick.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1603.5
  • — Z (S) $3207

1926.451 E01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Abate by
Sep 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $3,741 · Current $1,871 Reduced
29 CFR 1926.451(e)(1): When scaffold platforms were more than two (2) feet (0.6 m) above or below a point of access, portable ladders, hook-on ladders, attachable ladders, stair towers (scaffold stairways/towers), stairway-type ladders (such as ladder stands), ramps, walkways, integral prefabricated scaffold access, or direct access from other scaffold, structure, personnel hoist, or similar surface was not used:  a/  At the job site, safe access and/or egress belonging to a ladder-jack scaffold was not provided.  Specifically, the two brackets supporting the walking/working platform were facing away from the exterior wall of the building by approximately two feet. Employee(s) were required to kneel down on the walking/working platform then extend their leg over the bracket and place a foot onto the ladder rung.  A fall distance of approximately 22 feet existed.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1870.5
  • — Z (S) $3741

1926.451 G01 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Abate by
Sep 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(g)(1)(i): Each employee on a boatswains' chair, catenary scaffold, float scaffold, needle beam scaffold, or ladder jack scaffold was not protected by a personal fall arrest system (PFAS):  a/  At the job site, employee(s) working from a ladder-jack scaffold were not provided with a PFAS.  The walking/working platform was approximately 22 feet above the sidewalk below.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.452 K01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Abate by
Sep 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.452(k)(1): Platforms on a ladder-jack scaffold exceeded a height of 20 feet (6.1 m):  a/  At the job site, the walking/working platform supported by a ladder-jack scaffold was approximately 22 feet above the concrete sidewalk.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $0
  • — Z (S) $0

1926.451 F07

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Abate by
Sep 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.451(f)(7): Scaffolds were not erected, moved, dismantled, or altered only under the supervision and direction of a competent person qualified in scaffold erection, moving, dismantling or alteration:  At the job site, the employer did not designate a competent person to erect and use a ladder-jack scaffold.  The following hazards/violations were noted on 09/01/16:  a/  The lack of safe access and egress.  b/  The lack of a personal fall arrest system.  c/  The working platform exceeded 20 feet by two feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1926.454 A01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Sep 13, 2016
Abate by
Sep 19, 2016
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1926.454(a)(1):  The employer did not have each employee who performs work while on a scaffold trained by a person qualified in the subject matter to recognize the hazards associated with the type of scaffold being used and to understand the procedures to control or minimize those hazards:  At the job site, exposed employee(s) were unable to recognize the following hazards associated with a ladder-jack scaffold:  a/  The lack of safe access and egress.  b/  The lack of a personal fall arrest system.  c/  The working platform exceeded 20 feet by two feet.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341744621.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.