NEWFIELDS, NH —
OSHA Inspection: HUTCHINSON SEALING SYSTEMS INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of HUTCHINSON SEALING SYSTEMS INC. in 171 EXETER ROAD #169, NEWFIELDS, NH 03856 (NAICS 326299). OSHA activity number 341751394.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- HUTCHINSON SEALING SYSTEMS INC.
- Site address
- 171 EXETER ROAD #169
- City
- NEWFIELDS
- State
- NH
- ZIP
- 03856
- Mailing
- PO BOX 169, NEWFIELDS, NH 03856
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 326299
- Employees
- 425
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.178 A04
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $8,908 · Current $5,346 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(4): Modifications and additions which affect capacity and safe operation of powered industrial truck were performed by the employer without the manufacturer's prior written approval: a. Site - On or about August 29, 2016, prior written approval was not obtained for the 108 inch fork extensions used on the Yale, Model GLC080VXNGSE092, Serial No. E818V0152D. b. Site On or about August 22, 2016, prior written approval was not obtained for the Vestil Telescoping Boom used on the Yale, Model GLC080VXNGSE092, Serial No. E818V0152D.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5346
- — Z (S) $8908
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(a)(5): The powered industrial truck was equipped with front-end attachments other than factory installed attachments, however the employer did not request that the truck be marked to identify the attachments and show the approximate weight of the truck and attachment combination at maximum elevation with load laterally centered: Site - On or about August 29, 2016, the employer did not have the Yale, Model GLC080VXNGSE092, Serial No. E818V0152D, marked to identify forklift extensions and the telescopic boom used to moved production machinery and related equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $7,482 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(1)(i): The employer did not ensure that each powered industrial truck operator was competent to operate a powered industrial truck safely, as demonstrated by the successful completion of the training and evaluation specified in this paragraph (l): a. Site On or about September 2, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that each forklift operator was competent in that training did not include fork and attachment adaptation, operation, and use limitations as required by 1910.178(l)(3)(i)(G). b. Site On or about September 2, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that each forklift operator was competent in that training did not include site-specific composition of loads to be carried and load stability as required by 1910.178(l)(3)(ii)(B).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7482
- — Z (S) $12471
1910.178 L03 I G
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(i)(G): Powered industrial truck operators did not receive initial training on fork and attachment adaptation, operation, and use limitations; a. Site - On or about September 2, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that each forklift operator received training fork and attachment adaptation, operation, and use limitations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 L03 II B
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(l)(3)(ii)(B): Powered industrial truck operators did not receive initial training on load composition and stability: a. Site - On or about September 2, 2016, the employer failed to ensure that each forklift operator received training on site-specific composition of loads to be carried and load stability.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.178 O01
- Issued
- Oct 18, 2016
- Abate by
- Nov 21, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $12,471 · Current $7,482 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.178(o)(1): Load(s) on powered industrial truck(s) were not stable or safely arranged: a. Site - On or about September 2, 2016, manufacturing equipment including, but not limited to the MAPLAN injection molding machine (Model MTF 100/40C, Serial NO. 1100074-06) was not stabilized and safely arranged prior to being lifted and moved with the Yale forklift (Model GLC080VXNGSE092, Serial No. E818V0152D).
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $7482
- — Z (S) $12471
More inspections at Hutchinson Sealing Systems INC.
View Hutchinson Sealing Systems INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 326299)
More inspections in NH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341751394.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.