Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ATLANTIC INSULATION, LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of ATLANTIC INSULATION, LLC in 335 ROUTE 125, EPPING, NH 03042 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 341753028.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Atlantic Insulation, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Atlantic Insulation, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
335 ROUTE 125
City
EPPING
State
NH
ZIP
03042
Mailing
335 ROUTE 125, EPPING, NH 03042
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
B
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
Employees
5
Ownership type
A

4 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 5 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Jan 23, 2017
Penalty
Initial $2,672 · Current $1,605 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace:    a. Facility: 355 Rt. 125 Epping, NH - On or about September 7, 2016, employees did not have a medical evaluation prior to initial use of respirators for activities involving spray foam insulation application and application clean-up following spraying. The employees wore full face supplied air respirators, and were exposed to respiratory hazards including, but not limited to, methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI).    Instance deleted with ISA  b.  Facility: 355 Rt. 125 Epping, NH - On or about September 7, 2016, employees did not have a medical evaluation prior to initial use of respirators for activities involving fiberglass and cellulose work.  The employees were required to wear filtering face piece N95 dust mask respirators.    c.  Facility: 355 Rt. 125 Epping, NH - On or about September 7, 2016 workers voluntarily wearing 3M 6001 full face piece type respirators were not provided a medical evaluation prior to use.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1605
  • — Z (S) $2672

1910.134 F01

Serious Gravity 1 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Dec 1, 2016
Penalty
Initial $1,604 · Current $962 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting face piece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT):    a. Facility: 355 Rt. 125 Epping, NH - On or about September 7, 2016, employees were not provided with a respirator fit test prior to initial use of 3M full face-piece respirators use during scraping/cleaning work following spraying application.    Instance deleted with ISA b.  Facility: 355 Rt. 125 Epping, NH - On or about September 7, 2016, employees were not provided with a respirator fit test prior to initial use to ensure that the respirator provided effective protection. The employees were required to wear filtering face piece N95 dust mask type respirators during work activities involving fiberglass and cellulose.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $962
  • — Z (S) $1604

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Jan 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.134(c)(2)(i): Respirator users were not provided with the information contained in Appendix D to 29 CFR 1910.134 when the employer determined that any voluntary respirator use was permissible:  a. Facility: 355 Rt. 125 Epping, NH - On or about September 7, 2016 workers voluntarily wearing full face piece type respirators were not provided with the information in Appendix D.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

1910.1200 E01

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 18, 2016
Abate by
Jan 9, 2017
Penalty
Initial $0 · Current $0
29 CFR 1910.1200(e)(1): The employer did not develop, implement, and/or maintain at the workplace a written hazard communication program which describes how the criteria specified in 29 CFR 1910.1200(f), (g), and (h) will be met:  a.     Facility: 355 Rt. 125 Epping, NH -   On or about September 7, 2016, the employer did not develop and maintain a written hazard communication program for employees working with and around hazardous chemicals including but not limited to: Methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O) $0
  • — Z (O) $0

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341753028.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.