MESHOPPEN, PA —
OSHA Inspection: S&K STONE INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of S&K STONE INCORPORATED in 243 MCGAVIN ROAD, MESHOPPEN, PA 18630 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 341754745.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- S&K STONE INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 243 MCGAVIN ROAD
- City
- MESHOPPEN
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 18630
- Mailing
- 243 MCGAVIN ROAD, MESHOPPEN, PA 18630
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.1000 C
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $2,423 · Current $1,726 Reduced
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(c): An employee(s) was exposed to Silica, Crystalline Quartz, (respirable) in excess of the 8-hour time weighted average limits listed in Table Z-3: a) Production building, a sliding table saw operator was exposed to Silica, Crystalline Quartz, (respirable) at an 8 hour time weighted average of 0.701 milligrams per cubic meter of air (mg/M3) while cutting stone. The exposure was 1.26 times the Permissible Exposure Limit of 0.556 mg/M3. The PEL was established to prevent silicosis. The exposure was established over 455 minutes of personal sampling conducted on September 16, 2016. Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1726
- — Z (S) $2423
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2016
- Abate by
- May 31, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1000(e): Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not determined and implemented to achieve compliance with the limits prescribed in 29 CFR 1910.1000(a) through (d): a) Production building, a sliding table saw operator was exposed to Silica, Crystalline Quartz, (respirable) at an 8 hour time weighted average of 0.701 milligrams per cubic meter of air (mg/M3) while cutting stone. Feasible administrative or engineering controls were not implemented to reduce the employee exposure, September 16, 2016. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED General methods of control would include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Move one of the floor pusher fans so that it keeps the dust cloud generated by the saw away from the employee as it travels to the wall mounted exhaust fans. 2. Install rubber sheet or fabric bristle skirting on the lower portion of the saw blade enclosure. The skirting should be as close to the stone surface as possible and should direct airflow and mist towards the rear and downward. No part of the skirting should produce buffeting which may direct dust outwards towards the operators. Abatement Schedule Step 1 A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures to hazardous substances as referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: (1) Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; (2) Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; (3) Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; (4) Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls. All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a competent industrial hygienist or other technically qualified person. Step 2 Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and /or administrative controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 1 (15 days) Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 2 (90 days)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,817 · Current $908 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(e)(1): The employer did not provide a medical evaluation to determine the employee's ability to use a respirator, before the employee was fit tested or required to use the respirator in the workplace: a) Production building, a sliding table saw operator who was exposed to Silica, Crystalline Quartz, (respirable) wore a negative pressure respirator and did not receive a medical evaluation, on or about, September 16, 2016. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $908
- — Z (S) $1817
1910.134 F01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 2, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $0 · Current $0
9010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.134(f)(1): The employer did not ensure that employee(s) required to use a tight-fitting facepiece respirator passed the appropriate qualitative fit test (QLFT) or quantitative fit test (QNFT): a) Production building, a sliding table saw operator who was exposed to Silica, Crystalline Quartz, (respirable) wore a negative pressure respirator and did not receive a fit test, on or about, September 16, 2016. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $0
- — Z (S) $0
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Nov 9, 2016
- Abate by
- Jan 16, 2017
- Penalty
- Initial $1,817 · Current $908 Reduced
8111
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1): The employer did not administer a continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (o) whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level of 85 decibels measured on the A scale, or equivalently a dose of fifty percent: a) Production building, the sliding table saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 121% of the allowable eight (8)-hour time weighted sound level of 90 decibels (dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 121% is approximately 91 dBA. The sampling was performed for 356 minutes on September 16, 2016. (Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time.) A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted. b) Production building, an arm saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 114% of the allowable eight (8)-hour time weighted sound level of 90 decibels (dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 114% is approximately 90 dBA. The sampling was performed for 464 minutes on September 16, 2016. A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted. c) Production building, an assistant arm saw operator was exposed to continuous noise levels at 127% of the allowable eight (8)-hour time weighted sound level of 90 decibels (dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 127% is approximately 91 dBA. The sampling was performed for 470 minutes on September 16, 2016. (Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time.) A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted. d) Production building, an employee performing thermaling was exposed to continuous noise levels at 93% of the allowable eight (8)-hour time weighted sound level of 90 decibels (dBA). The equivalent dBA level of 93% is approximately 89 dBA. The sampling was performed for 352 minutes on September 16, 2016. (Zero exposure was assumed for the unsampled period of time.) A continuing, effective hearing conservation program as described in 29 CFR 1910.95(c) through (n) was not instituted. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED ABATEMENT NOTE: A comprehensive, effective hearing conservation program consisting of the following elements shall be developed and implemented for all employees whose exposure equals or exceeds 85 dBA on an 8-hour time weighted average: 1. Initial exposure monitoring and periodic reassessment of employees to determine noise exposures. 2. Establishment and maintenance of an annual audiometric testing program for all employees who work in the facility. 3. Provision and enforcement of hearing protection devices for all employees who work in the facility. 4. Institution of an initial training program for all employees, as well as annual refresher training, including information on the hazards of noise, purpose of audiometric testing, and proper use of hearing protectors. 5. Maintenance of records as they relate to employee exposure measurements, medical examinations, and training.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $908
- — Z (S) $1817
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341754745.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.