HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: JOSE RUIZ
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JOSE RUIZ in 10406 SOLITUDE WAY, HOUSTON, TX 77044 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 341759777.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JOSE RUIZ
- Site address
- 10406 SOLITUDE WAY
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77044
- Mailing
- 4831 CROKER RIDGE ROAD, HOUSTON, TX 77053
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- B
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
1926.102 A01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $2,138 · Current $1,283 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.102(a)(1): Eye and face protective equipment were not used when machines or operations presented potential eye or face injury from physical, chemical, or radiation agents.(a) On or about September 7, 2016, on the steep roof of a newly built single family dwelling, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a pneumatic nail gun to install roofing material without eye protection.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1282.8
- — Z (S) $2138
1926.501 B13
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $3,741 · Current $2,245 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.501(b)(13): Each employee(s) engaged in residential construction activities 6 feet (1.8 m) or more above lower levels were not protected by guardrail systems, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system, nor were employee(s) provided with an alternative fall protection measure under another provision of paragraph 1926.501 (b): On or about September 7, 2016, on the steep roof of a newly built single family dwelling, employees were exposed to a fall hazard exceeding six feet when performing roofing work without a fall protection system.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2244.6
- — Z (S) $3741
1926.1053 B01
- Issued
- Sep 27, 2016
- Abate by
- Oct 17, 2016
- Penalty
- Initial $1,604 · Current $962 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1926.1053(b)(1): Where portable ladders were used for access to an upper landing surface and the ladder's length allows, the ladder side rails did not extend at least 3 feet (.9 m) above the upper landing surface being accessed: On or about September 7, 2016, on the west side of a single family dwelling, employees were exposed to a fall hazard when accessing the roof area from an extension ladder without the rails extending three feet above the landing area.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $962.4
- — Z (S) $1604
More inspections at Jose Ruiz
View Jose Ruiz's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 341759777.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.